RE: [PATCH] dnsmasq: 2.76test10 with latest patches (001-004)

["Kienker, Fred" <fkienker@at4b.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1672 bytes --]

Is there any chance the x86_64 version will ever be released? If it is a 
question of testing, I will volunteer to test it.

Best regards,
Fred Kienker

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Tremer [mailto:michael.tremer(a)ipfire.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:49 PM
To: Paul Simmons; development(a)lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dnsmasq: 2.76test10 with latest patches (001-004)

Hi,

On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 15:39 -0600, Paul Simmons wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 20:22 +0100, Matthias Fischer wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 28.02.2016 21:19, Michael Tremer wrote:
> > > 
> > > I merged this patch and the one after.
> > > 
> > > Please give this version a good test as it is a pre-release 
> > > version.
> > Its running here.
> > 
> > > 
> > > You can maintain a branch where you integrate all new changes, but 

> > > I think it is not required to send every single one to the mailing 

> > > list.
> > > It creates a bit of noise and I think that unfortunately nobody is 

> > > testing every single one any ways. Which is sad.
> > Yep. ;-)
> > 
> > > 
> > > Can we have maybe one aggregated patch after every release of a 
> > > Core Update? So we always have the latest version of dnsmasq in 
> > > the updates?
> > I'll do that. If not otherwise wanted, I'll send the current - 
> > patched - version after every Core Update.
> > 
> > Best,
> > Matthias
> 
> @list:
> 
> I hope to have an opportunity to test RealSoonNow via an alternate 
> boot scheme on current hardware.
> 
> Do you want me to test the i586 or the x86_64?

Ideally both :) But as we do not release the 64 bit builds at the 
moment, i586 is preferred.

Best,
-Michael

> 
> Paul