From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail02.haj.ipfire.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail02.haj.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ZgkK95Zxrz332h for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2025 22:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail01.ipfire.org (mail01.haj.ipfire.org [172.28.1.202]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail01.haj.ipfire.org", Issuer "R10" (verified OK)) by mail02.haj.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZgkK61xfKz32MJ for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2025 22:52:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from layka.disroot.org (layka.disroot.org [178.21.23.139]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail01.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZgkK45cdZzlL for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2025 22:52:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail01.ipfire.org; dkim=pass header.d=disroot.org header.s=mail header.b=PuZObhYS; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=disroot.org; spf=pass (mail01.ipfire.org: domain of robin.roevens@disroot.org designates 178.21.23.139 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=robin.roevens@disroot.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.ipfire.org; s=202003rsa; t=1745189529; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:dkim-signature; bh=uSQkYyV6UB8neBqZgLu69ugedCLSQGXchezVtkOtybM=; b=k3595G6WjgVJAGpmlTknZVANUtHjyPs2GSirCQavG38iHKzX+vTKBBb5qozoIPOPKAspFv DOq+ulynNMSF/aH/54a650Wqz5WjgOvFL/N6Xz7kNMpnwZcw9lZLUvN2QSa1CQC3GQr8pK c9MDHBZL3BdpgLEC30bLq8xcDdtm5hqidI3AugfvO6aE7SJ6WI1NqNuPbiZt7ZpEQVVEV9 OVijpflF8STXWXPkw5rHmd+bD+qSMZwq58d/6QQ9FKwychuDXw+4/FBULMqiysSpw7VNR+ JqCfUanZyMx6qgwvuSsqACVq4zLvyahSZMzf6oeQBGgLrMH8jblEem6TbNSYHQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mail01.ipfire.org; dkim=pass header.d=disroot.org header.s=mail header.b=PuZObhYS; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=disroot.org; spf=pass (mail01.ipfire.org: domain of robin.roevens@disroot.org designates 178.21.23.139 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=robin.roevens@disroot.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=202003rsa; d=lists.ipfire.org; t=1745189529; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Kaathbqtwx19nQ6A41S6oNGa2wjoQ02SfNxkb7IQkvkeYmAYO/KaWjDUuBHrlSna7qBLtp 0wOXjl3GegYpMDIE3ABnRPjR0/ZYMQM48qvQeTVDhA30pAnxhmL/FE/S0jN3buax7Ytj2N YvKXGhB1mCvXzBz8tmJwctXQ22URWBy7G4F+sO6QLaZg0hQtqfEwGoIege+HES7lZFeD+q tqvS2CJxTbRxn1eYeLdce7uzvyKcWrgWE5iH1GHg/OyZ8fcU7v71B095J+vCcXqM7tzJUx l2N5/sgPYpvyVgu6lKv2KK/F5zLxhrUYAtJM9YEbJDPIcNi6IKX2g1MhtRDzcg== Received: from mail01.disroot.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B1E25DA3 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:52:07 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from layka.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id iEbSQe8yiMEh for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:52:07 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1745189527; bh=uSQkYyV6UB8neBqZgLu69ugedCLSQGXchezVtkOtybM=; h=Subject:From:To:Date; b=PuZObhYS0vAlQPVWQGRmPFhblBvJy6dl2WDZeOXJ/Y5qwlS2Yz23lGYipKFg3LfiR CU8+9duMbBMqzyh/G+WVCU7BhTstfnBhU/uUjdudFue+k86bGge6Tu5PvAUvgPdgYQ BRlRH0hQrsjMTabqjXJxA5+CSp7AQMJHOoh52w0tBnjpa3owXRmNpIvVe7in+cFZ7g 17PwHImmJU8QlNd/0q0TxyH9NGq9ZybyHHuUI9g32B8Rsb8p2xNzXau89cgs2+AJct 8mQ7R4qls7rz4qJUHeLijzQUMBCvG5QQr7jcWRiRwTwQgV75kSymEAxDKAXCBE48Yu M+M6U/lzH+EIg== Received: from chojin.roevenslambrechts.be (Chojin.roevenslambrechts.be [192.168.0.50]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (no client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender) by hachiman (MailScanner Milter) with SMTP id B1E71321178 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:52:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Subject: ARP ping instead of ICMP ping for gateway latency check ? From: Robin Roevens To: development@lists.ipfire.org Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:52:00 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.54.3 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: Sender: Mail-Followup-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-RoevensLambrechts-MailScanner-ID: B1E71321178.A2ACD X-RoevensLambrechts-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-RoevensLambrechts-MailScanner-From: robin.roevens@disroot.org X-RoevensLambrechts-MailScanner-Watermark: 1745794325.65143@zu+y1pbAoxQAYsY6AHJRYA X-Rspamd-Server: mail01.haj.ipfire.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4ZgkK45cdZzlL X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.48 / 11.00]; SPF_REPUTATION_SPAM(2.56)[0.85286488207587]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-1.69)[disroot.org:s=mail]; BAYES_HAM(-1.57)[92.24%]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RBL_SENDERSCORE_REPUT_9(-1.00)[178.21.23.139:from]; NEURAL_HAM(-1.00)[-1.000]; DKIM_REPUTATION(-0.96)[-0.96343092010434]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[disroot.org,reject]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[disroot.org:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[development@lists.ipfire.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:50673, ipnet:178.21.23.0/24, country:NL]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_SIGNED(0.00)[lists.ipfire.org:s=202003rsa:i=1] X-Rspamd-Action: no action Hi All I recently changed my internet provider and I noticed that both the gateway graph on cgi-bin/netother.cgi and my Zabbix gateway ping check no longer work. It seems that my current provider blocks ICMP pings on the gateway address. So I was wondering if it wouldn't be better to use arping instead of normal ping to check the latency of the gateway? This should always works regardless of firewalls of the provider.. I think? I can quite easily change this Zabbix check. But I'm not sure about the graph on netother.cgi; I can look into that if you all think that change would be a good idea? Or if anyone could give me some pointers on where to start looking? Regards Robin --=20 Dit bericht is gescanned op virussen en andere gevaarlijke inhoud door MailScanner en lijkt schoon te zijn.