From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter =?utf-8?q?M=C3=BCller?= <peter.mueller@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: Is/should efivar be a package?
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 10:48:30 +0000
Message-ID: <a85aa355-0e99-1cf1-174a-cfb147ea6eef@ipfire.org>
In-Reply-To: <CA185C31-9FAA-4A54-996D-244273FF7974@ipfire.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7264295155795396764=="
List-Id: <development.lists.ipfire.org>

--===============7264295155795396764==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello Michael,

thanks for your reply.

Sigh, that was my improperly caffeinated self typing before thinking, again. =
:-/

Best,
Peter M=C3=BCller

> Hello,
>=20
> This is the version from upstream, and not PAK_VER.
>=20
>> On 12 Sep 2022, at 11:51, Peter M=C3=BCller <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org> w=
rote:
>>
>> Hello *,
>>
>> I just stumbled across this line in the efivar LFS file:
>>
>>> VER        =3D 38
>>
>> Since the correspondent rootfile is in ~/config/rootfiles/common/, I guess
>> efivar is not a package, and this line can/should be removed. Same issue
>> applies to efibootmgr, by the way.
>=20
> We need this in the installer and GRUB needs it on EFI-based systems.
>=20
>> Am I mistaken here? Did I miss anything?
>=20
> Maybe :)
>=20
>>
>> Thanks, and best regards,
>> Peter M=C3=BCller
>=20

--===============7264295155795396764==--