From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adolf Belka To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: Test of cleanup branch Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2024 12:50:19 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3404039316142667892==" List-Id: --===============3404039316142667892== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Michael, On 25/07/2024 12:28, Adolf Belka wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On 25/07/2024 10:44, Michael Tremer wrote: >> Hello Adolf, >> >> Thank you for getting back on this so quickly. >> Maybe I got back too quickly!! I have just done a build with next for a bugfix patch and installed it into m= y vm and the pages look quite different with some things missing, like the gr= een and red colours for if services are running or not and some graph titles = are incorrect. I took the iso from the latest directory in the nightly build but it looks li= ke it was still linked to the previous version when I downloaded it as the b2= sum is for build 6460dbbf from the day before. Downloading the iso today from the latest directory gives me the build ed2c97= b7. I am going to install that version now but I suspect it will show the same as= I found with my build. So it looks like my original review was based on the version before the clean= up branch changes were included. I will come back with new feedback of what I find from the latest branch that= I have now downloaded. Sorry. In future maybe I should wait till the following day, or download from= the build named directory instead of the directory named latest. Regards, Adolf >> I suppose this also means that the ISO in the next branch boots just fine,= too? > > Yes, that is correct. I used the iso from the nightly next latest directory= . No problems with the install at all. > This tested out raid and all 4 interfaces. > > Regards, > Adolf. > >> >> Best, >> -Michael >> >>> On 25 Jul 2024, at 09:07, Adolf Belka wrote: >>> >>> Hi Michael, >>> >>> I installed CU188 from the nightly onto a vm system and looked though all= the WUI pages and everything looked fine. >>> >>> I then restored a CU187 backup from my testing and then checked the OpenV= PN RW and N2N. Both worked fine with no problems. Also the logging for that a= ll worked with no problems. >>> >>> Also checked out the IPS, IP Blocklists, Firewall groups and rules, DNS .= .. >>> >>> Everything I have looked at shows no impact from the cleanup branch chang= es. It looks good to me. >>> >>> Of course good for others to also evaluate. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Adolf. >>> >> --===============3404039316142667892==--