From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adolf Belka To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: Pending package updates Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 13:33:56 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1DF29C8B-B550-4518-A810-D2A2DAC16CF9@ipfire.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0628177062091799674==" List-Id: --===============0628177062091799674== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Michael, I was going to raise a ticket for fixing collectd in bugzilla but I need an a= ccount to do that and I couldn't find any registration option to create an ac= count. Can you help me with getting an account on Bugzilla for IPFire. I need this anyway as I want to have a look at some of the bugs listed in the= re to see if there is anything that I can help with. For the iptables patch, I will send that shortly and also the patches for lib= netfilter-queue, libnetfilter-conntrack and conntrack-tools. Then you have th= em all available and can then decide which ones you will merge and when. Regards, Adolf. On 04/09/2020 17:46, Michael Tremer wrote: > Hello, > >> On 3 Sep 2020, at 09:23, Adolf Belka wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Just had a look through the netfilter mailing list archive and found the a= nnouncement for iptables-1.8.4 and it mentions the following:- >> >> "libiptc: - Generic libiptc.so shared object is no longer built, likely al= l users link to libip4tc.so or libip6tc.so directly" >> >> So that explains the problem we are having. So it looks like collectd need= s to be rewritten to use libip4tc.so or libip6tc.so shared libraries. Until = then I presume we have to stay on iptables-1.8.3 > For the time being, yes. There are some other packages to work on first. > > However, this would be an easy fix we can simply patch into our version of = collectd and therefore we should be fine. > > Could someone please submit a patch for iptables which we are not going to = merge, yet, and create a ticket for fixing collectd and assigning that to me? > > Best, > -Michael > >> Regards, >> >> Adolf >> >> >> On 03/09/2020 10:14, Adolf Belka wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I ran the build of iptables 1.8.3 and 1.8.5 and compared the logs for the= two of them. The problem seems to be that 1.8.5 never creates the libiptc.so= libraries. It only creates the libip4tc.so and libip6tc.so libraries. >>> >>> iptables-1.8.3 creates libip4tc.so, libip6tc.so and libiptc.so libraries. >>> >>> >>> I have checked the changelogs for the 1.8.4 and 1.8.5 releases of iptable= s and it doesn't mention anything about this, as far as I can see. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Adolf >>> >>> On 02/09/2020 20:27, Matthias Fischer wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On 02.09.2020 17:36, Michael Tremer wrote: >>>>> Did the iptables build by any chance remove libiptc? >>>> Yes. Confirmed with a clean build. >>>> >>>> No idea how to fix this, yet. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Matthias --===============0628177062091799674==--