From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Tremer To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: Core 122 updates Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2018 09:14:14 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <578BF898-3F94-4ED9-BD24-983245F07D5B@rymes.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3744108604840633824==" List-Id: --===============3744108604840633824== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2018-08-02 at 23:41 -0400, Tom Rymes wrote: >=20 >=20 > On Aug 2, 2018, at 2:58 PM, Kienker, Fred wrote: >=20 > >=20 > > Michael=E2=80=99s posting on the website about maybe it is time for a =E2= =80=9Cclean=E2=80=9D reinstall is very much to the point. But this is very ha= rd to do with these older systems. I=E2=80=99m not sure it is possible to ins= tall 122 then restore a backup from 120, but I may well be wrong. >=20 > Fred, >=20 > I=E2=80=99d advise against installing an older backup to a newer system if = you can avoid it. Why not install 120 as a clean install, restore the backup,= and then upgrade. Will the 120 clean install not have a larger /boot? Actually, this is a good point. Configuration wise it doesn't make a difference but certificates that have been generated with MD5 should be renewed and that is probably most easy to do with a new installation from scratch. Best, -Michael >=20 > Tom --===============3744108604840633824==--