From: IT Superhack <itsuperhack@web.de>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Question concerning commit #eef9b2529c3cab522dac4f4bcfa1a0075376514e
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 08:13:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <be92e546-5488-c129-f84a-17982c5bcd78@web.de> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1413 bytes --]
Hello Michael, hello List,
I have a question concerning the commit #eef9b2529c3cab522dac4f4bcfa1a0075376514e
(http://git.ipfire.org/?p=ipfire-2.x.git;a=commit;h=eef9b2529c3cab522dac4f4bcfa1a0075376514e).
It is correct that htpasswd uses the MD5 algorithm as default, which is
not very secure indeed. However, the -s option (which enforces the use
of SHA) is insecure since there is no salt.
In case IPFire uses the same htpasswd version I use, I'd suggest the
use of bcrypt (option: -B), since it is stronger than both SHA and MD5.
This issue also appears in the help output of htpasswd:
twilson(a)fra-03-47-1b:~> htpasswd --help
[...]
-m Force MD5 encryption of the password (default).
-B Force bcrypt encryption of the password (very secure).
-C Set the computing time used for the bcrypt algorithm
(higher is more secure but slower, default: 5, valid: 4 to 31).
-d Force CRYPT encryption of the password (8 chars max, insecure).
-s Force SHA encryption of the password (insecure).
-p Do not encrypt the password (plaintext, insecure).
[...]
On other systems than Windows and NetWare the '-p' flag will probably not work.
The SHA algorithm does not use a salt and is less secure than the MD5 algorithm.
twilson(a)fra-03-47-1b:~>
If your htpasswd version is somehow patched against this problem, just
ignore my e-mail. :-)
Best regards,
Timmothy Wilson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2016-10-05 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-05 8:13 IT Superhack [this message]
2016-10-05 10:52 ` Michael Tremer
2016-10-06 14:00 ` IT Superhack
2016-10-06 15:46 ` IT Superhack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=be92e546-5488-c129-f84a-17982c5bcd78@web.de \
--to=itsuperhack@web.de \
--cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox