-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi, On Sat, 2018-08-04 at 19:41 +0200, Peter Müller wrote: > Hello *, > > sorry for the late reply. > > It was me who added DNS.WATCH services to the DNS server list again as soon > as they were available again here. > > My opinion of this service is as follows: > (a) Being unavailable for weeks without any notice is certainly a bad sign. > At least they cannot be considered reliable. Which is probably one of the most important things when running a DNS resolver. > (b) They state "no logging" on their website (we will never know if this is > true or not) - compared to more commercial services (Google & Co.), this is > at least something. It is a promise. Just like Google promised to never be evil... I am quite confident that promises like those are being breached a lot. > (c) Well, technically, they did not tried to manipulate DNS replies or something > similar. The JavaScript on their website is funny of course, but it seems to > be "just" for analytics... Luckily nobody has to visit the website to use the DNS servers. But there is a company behind it who's website doesn't load. No idea what they are doing. IT is not their main business. I do not see why anyone should be using this when there is so many alternatives around. > I am happy with having them deleted from the Wiki list. Will stop using them > during the next few days. Okay. It doesn't mean that nobody should be using them, but certainly we won't recommend them any more. - -Michael > > Thanks, and best regards, > Peter Müller > > > Yes, I agree. We should remove them from the list. > > > > Not because of that bit of JS there (which is funny in itself), but basically > > because they are unreliable and nobody knows who is behind it and how to get in > > touch with them. At least that is my perception of all of this. > > > > And it is not that there are no alternatives. There are plenty and people should > > choose from there. > > > > Best, > > -Michael > > > > On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 20:09 +0200, Matthias Fischer wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 20.07.2018 17:35, Michael Tremer wrote: > > > > I have seen that you have re-added them on the wiki, too. > > > > > > > > Is this a trustworthy DNS provider? > > > > > > Jm2C: > > > They failed on Februar, 4th for about two days and now again - > > > even longer - without any comment. > > > > > > Besides, I found some intersting comments during searching here: > > > https://forum.kuketz-blog.de/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=187 (german) > > > > > > The code mentioned there ist still present on their site: > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > IMHO we should delete this entry. > > > > > > Best, > > > Matthias > > > > > > > -Michael > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 19:35 +0200, Peter Müller wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > looks like both DNS servers and website are up again. > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > Peter Müller > > > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE5/rW5l3GGe2ypktxgHnw/2+QCQcFAltm0poACgkQgHnw/2+Q CQcKAQ/+JxyA5TY7EtISMbhtUNHXLFMeP4TCU4CdegbmppVLQ5UnppXc1I7BkGbh Nyo+G7rs9lZREmBVJ+RR48dT3ZLJTCT3X5T/qNXVKKuzpttX4r6kO+CkCME9JlFz p2zHInlxQpgHPiGLBOhhvU219glsgfR7zdCnc45RxBQ7WrivdsznxW0TcKbpR1q6 lmdB7+N0hk4vYGk1SkBk3E+3gtUnTbRnbI95ezlUJBo0ccgKnp6EcOs0ffNbOI7f RJwDe/qoIvoqxNGiCaGGyh8FuosmdonBvrVchbFWyhYUxQiSFutSBlPLnFWCGWAl 2coi5Hry0d4lBmW4qCwOh7MnRw1qpaR8OjuEpFkGm4X+FTMRm+LGHRitQ405VRWZ rsHS04lNevN+3KN3trPiOwH7j+7A9/9+ubWuJI73qLW70BRE0AMZEzdFN9w1ReIN oIC8KkQZXAO1GJMRET3vv4SzXT7zSI5sas/Q07njwpyGaTxk+5gwWD+NhkN3IUzd 7kTs962Q8KWqgeIJAKDg5CfKcDj43AdBtjbelqjvfLzVU/S5Q4Xs2PDECpSxF6Gd g2Fd59+IL5m7Xj9USmCGjLjVmih7e5knF02zpD62X2UzFwdXI1XdJPRf/T4VD7eP GGjx+4NgJVeWUdwfiW0D3aShNCW20axvDnfzjOoyRVfIv1gvXPk= =nga3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----