-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
On Sat, 2018-08-04 at 19:41 +0200, Peter Müller wrote:
> Hello *,
>
> sorry for the late reply.
>
> It was me who added DNS.WATCH services to the DNS server list again as soon
> as they were available again here.
>
> My opinion of this service is as follows:
> (a) Being unavailable for weeks without any notice is certainly a bad sign.
> At least they cannot be considered reliable.
Which is probably one of the most important things when running a DNS
resolver.
> (b) They state "no logging" on their website (we will never know if this is
> true or not) - compared to more commercial services (Google & Co.), this is
> at least something.
It is a promise. Just like Google promised to never be evil... I am
quite confident that promises like those are being breached a lot.
> (c) Well, technically, they did not tried to manipulate DNS replies or something
> similar. The JavaScript on their website is funny of course, but it seems to
> be "just" for analytics...
Luckily nobody has to visit the website to use the DNS servers.
But there is a company behind it who's website doesn't load. No idea
what they are doing. IT is not their main business. I do not see why
anyone should be using this when there is so many alternatives around.
> I am happy with having them deleted from the Wiki list. Will stop using them
> during the next few days.
Okay.
It doesn't mean that nobody should be using them, but certainly we
won't recommend them any more.
- -Michael
>
> Thanks, and best regards,
> Peter Müller
>
> > Yes, I agree. We should remove them from the list.
> >
> > Not because of that bit of JS there (which is funny in itself), but basically
> > because they are unreliable and nobody knows who is behind it and how to get in
> > touch with them. At least that is my perception of all of this.
> >
> > And it is not that there are no alternatives. There are plenty and people should
> > choose from there.
> >
> > Best,
> > -Michael
> >
> > On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 20:09 +0200, Matthias Fischer wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 20.07.2018 17:35, Michael Tremer wrote:
> > > > I have seen that you have re-added them on the wiki, too.
> > > >
> > > > Is this a trustworthy DNS provider?
> > >
> > > Jm2C:
> > > They failed on Februar, 4th for about two days and now again -
> > > even longer - without any comment.
> > >
> > > Besides, I found some intersting comments during searching here:
> > > https://forum.kuketz-blog.de/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=187 (german)
> > >
> > > The code mentioned there ist still present on their site:
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > IMHO we should delete this entry.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > > > -Michael
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 19:35 +0200, Peter Müller wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > looks like both DNS servers and website are up again.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Peter Müller
> > >
> > >
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=nga3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----