public inbox for development@lists.ipfire.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adolf Belka <adolf.belka@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Security issues and concerns regarding soc addon
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 14:51:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c844f1e2-e5cc-e368-cd54-9096ee41cc81@ipfire.org> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1659 bytes --]

Hi All,

To make it clear this is nothing to do with Core Update 177 Testing.

Someone on the forum reported a problem with trying to run the sox addon.

I had a look at sox and tried to install it and then ran sox --version 
which then came up with a missing library.
Installed the addon that provided that library and then there was 
another missing library and so on.

sox kept having missing libraries until I had installed all of the 
following:-

alsa
flac
libmad
libid3tag
lame

The only dependency listed in sox was libvorbis. All these others should 
really be present as well.

After installing all those dependencies I ran sox --version and 
basically sox just hangs with no response at all. Ctrl C was required to 
stop it.

So I was wondering why sox was added to IPFire originally.

Looking through the web site info I found that the current version was 
released in 2015. The last commit looks to have been in 2021.

I found that Arch Linux is taking a git snapshot version due to there 
being many unfixed security vulnerabilities. Additionally they are 
patching with a patch that was used in Openwall to deal with 8 CVE's 
plus a fix for a CVE fix that introduced a regression.

The above does not make me feel very comfortable at all with having sox 
in IPFire.

It is described as the Swiss Army knife of sound processing programs and 
my view, based on my investigation, is that it should be removed from 
IPFire.

If users want to use it then it should be done on machines on the lan 
connected to IPFire, not on IPFire itself.


Looking forward to feedback on my observations and conclusion.

Regards,

Adolf.

-- 
Sent from my laptop


             reply	other threads:[~2023-07-28 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-28 12:51 Adolf Belka [this message]
2023-07-28 16:17 ` Michael Tremer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c844f1e2-e5cc-e368-cd54-9096ee41cc81@ipfire.org \
    --to=adolf.belka@ipfire.org \
    --cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox