Ok, this was probably a bad idea. So please ignore/remove this patch. 
Sorry for the noise.

Am 19.11.2022 um 12:53 schrieb Michael Tremer:
> I can second this.
>
> Why is fsck more obvious then “file system check”?
>
> It is a more technical term which does not provide any more detail in my opinion.
>
> -Michael
>
>> On 18 Nov 2022, at 18:02, Tom Rymes <tom(a)rymes.net> wrote:
>>
>> I'm  still confused by what a user might expect, OTHER than a fsck check?
>>
>> On 11/18/2022 10:42 AM, Robin Roevens wrote:
>>> Some users assume that "check filesystem" does more than just
>>> trigger a simple "fsck" run. This patch changes the button label to avoid
>>> confusion. - NL translation
>>> Signed-off-by: Robin Roevens <robin.roevens(a)disroot.org>
>>> ---
>>>   langs/nl/cgi-bin/nl.pl | 1 +
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>> diff --git a/langs/nl/cgi-bin/nl.pl b/langs/nl/cgi-bin/nl.pl
>>> index 4fd6955cc..ebac2754a 100644
>>> --- a/langs/nl/cgi-bin/nl.pl
>>> +++ b/langs/nl/cgi-bin/nl.pl
>>> @@ -1804,6 +1804,7 @@
>>>   'read list' => 'lijst met readonly hosts',
>>>   'real address' => 'Echte adressen',
>>>   'reboot' => 'Herstarten',
>>> +'reboot fsck' => 'Herstart & start &lsquo;fsck&rsquo;',
>>>   'reboot ask' => 'Herstarten?',
>>>   'reboot question' => 'Extra vraag voor herstart en afsluiten',
>>>   'reboot schedule' => 'Inplannen IPFire herstarts',