From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo-Andres Hofmann To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Rename misleading "check filesystem" reboot option NL translation Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 13:47:23 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2290025830094758998==" List-Id: --===============2290025830094758998== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ok, this was probably a bad idea. So please ignore/remove this patch.=20 Sorry for the noise. Am 19.11.2022 um 12:53 schrieb Michael Tremer: > I can second this. > > Why is fsck more obvious then =E2=80=9Cfile system check=E2=80=9D? > > It is a more technical term which does not provide any more detail in my op= inion. > > -Michael > >> On 18 Nov 2022, at 18:02, Tom Rymes wrote: >> >> I'm still confused by what a user might expect, OTHER than a fsck check? >> >> On 11/18/2022 10:42 AM, Robin Roevens wrote: >>> Some users assume that "check filesystem" does more than just >>> trigger a simple "fsck" run. This patch changes the button label to avoid >>> confusion. - NL translation >>> Signed-off-by: Robin Roevens >>> --- >>> langs/nl/cgi-bin/nl.pl | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> diff --git a/langs/nl/cgi-bin/nl.pl b/langs/nl/cgi-bin/nl.pl >>> index 4fd6955cc..ebac2754a 100644 >>> --- a/langs/nl/cgi-bin/nl.pl >>> +++ b/langs/nl/cgi-bin/nl.pl >>> @@ -1804,6 +1804,7 @@ >>> 'read list' =3D> 'lijst met readonly hosts', >>> 'real address' =3D> 'Echte adressen', >>> 'reboot' =3D> 'Herstarten', >>> +'reboot fsck' =3D> 'Herstart & start ‘fsck’', >>> 'reboot ask' =3D> 'Herstarten?', >>> 'reboot question' =3D> 'Extra vraag voor herstart en afsluiten', >>> 'reboot schedule' =3D> 'Inplannen IPFire herstarts', --===============2290025830094758998==--