From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail02.haj.ipfire.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail02.haj.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ZM7Yh1cFTz333p for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 22:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail01.ipfire.org (mail01.haj.ipfire.org [172.28.1.202]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail01.haj.ipfire.org", Issuer "R10" (verified OK)) by mail02.haj.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZM7Yc4Pn1z2xQd for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 22:50:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail01.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ZM7Yb3Jxdz7b; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 22:50:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfire.org; s=202003ed25519; t=1742856627; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ISeO0qkXcqClu7OGkxp+S/wdxyZjjV+CWCdiBH1+Ge4=; b=yb2Q1RcmAAhnwmNqG79m0RfGvLjaLILF6rtZZm0uJa7Xp6NfJ2IfybR4NYag9lTlCbdVel ecz82u5ghE35sKAQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfire.org; s=202003rsa; t=1742856627; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ISeO0qkXcqClu7OGkxp+S/wdxyZjjV+CWCdiBH1+Ge4=; b=kRwPRmxeBslEnrxP36x06sEd3u25qXbX/Td5hYfu7ZbtfFq0VLH/3700f0emU/UCOC33Ur /jlIFXc7tkG9LSRBJIviEcT08JKoqhTWRcnAB1QDGsY2wLdeLCrWOE0uqglnlAiA3y7jks 80kUgq1nwFq/M5wuC6oRJHKMiXF8GaWm11g4Roc2hUT7BeORhijwztvnfRLyogQcw2IDSK lxwzgkgJMfQLu2s/y3wYTUFpaDt5Us4pdyAOn1UdneF3RfSWw6rbRMW9aQlm8KXpGjXmJa /xInP9zOGkyTfEspODy3E0LLK4wKP92fwxjRvtMV/uk1HqYTw6MJrNucqDkW0A== Message-ID: Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 23:50:19 +0100 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: Sender: Mail-Followup-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Fwd: Advance Notification of Suricata 7.0.10 Content-Language: en-US To: Michael Tremer , "IPFire: Development-List" References: <62541C60-39E7-4E13-BC17-F647A1BF39F7@ipfire.org> From: Matthias Fischer In-Reply-To: <62541C60-39E7-4E13-BC17-F647A1BF39F7@ipfire.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Yep. I'll pick it up. On 24.03.2025 19:07, Michael Tremer wrote: > @Matthias: Are you free tomorrow to pick this one up? > >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> From: Jason Ish >> Subject: Advance Notification of Suricata 7.0.10 >> Date: 24 March 2025 at 16:12:12 GMT >> To: Jason Ish , Victor Julien >> >> Hello everyone, >> >> Last Tuesday, March 18, we released Suricata 7.0.9 which unfortunately contained an AF_PACKET regression affecting many users. >> >> If your configuration used a BPF filter and did not also tune the “default-packet-size” configuration parameter, Suricata would fail to start. A workaround is to set the “default-packet-size” to the default of 1514. This issue is tracked in the following ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/7618 >> >> Suricata 7.0.10 will be released tomorrow, Tuesday, March 25 to address this issue. >> >> Sorry for the inconvenience. >> >> Regards, >> The OISF Team >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to oss-advisories+unsubscribe@openinfosecfoundation.org . > >