From: Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: Are you by any chance working on Squid 5.4? :-)
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 19:00:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cdadb712-3e31-df90-12de-803543c137a8@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <62391045-3581-cb71-e9c2-26c05728b3dc@ipfire.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2494 bytes --]
On 10.02.2022 18:25, Peter Müller wrote:
> Hello Matthias,
Hi Peter,
> hello *,
>
> by coincidence, I just stumbled across a Squid 5.4 source tarball on source.ipfire.org:
Yep. ;-)
>> pmueller(a)people01:~$ ls -lah /pub/sources/source-2.x/squid-5.*
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 mfischer people 2.5M Aug 2 2021 /pub/sources/source-2.x/squid-5.1.tar.xz
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 mlorenz people 2.5M Oct 6 07:44 /pub/sources/source-2.x/squid-5.2.tar.xz
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 mfischer people 2.5M Dec 7 18:42 /pub/sources/source-2.x/squid-5.3.tar.xz
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 mfischer people 2.5M Feb 7 17:10 /pub/sources/source-2.x/squid-5.4.tar.xz
>
> I therefore presume you are working on this one. :-)
You're right - I do.
> While Squid 5.2, as it is now present in the upcoming Core Update 164, works fine, I
> observed at least one memory leak in it that eventually caused swapping on a productive
> infrastructure (under high load). Squid 5.4 should have that fixed.
I hope so, but I wanted to be sure before pushing.
> Because of this, I'd like to have Squid 5.4 in Core Update 164, so our users won't have
> to suffer from this bug. It is good to see you are taking care of it. Please do not feel
> pressured in any way, I just thought I mention this to you. :-)
No problem - one of my "Devels" is already busy... ;-)
While I'm writing this he is completing the final build. Looks good.
I nearly pushed 5.4 yesterday but then I saw this patch
(http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v5/changesets/):
http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v5/changesets/squid-5-1332f8d606485b5a2f57277634c2f6f7855bd9a6.patch
=> Bug #5055: FATAL FwdState::noteDestinationsEnd exception: opening (#967)
And now I'm not sure: shall I include this patch or not!?
Its a huge one.
Excerpt:
"Bug 5055: FATAL FwdState::noteDestinationsEnd exception: opening (#967)
* Bug 5055: FATAL FwdState::noteDestinationsEnd exception: opening
The bug was caused by commit 25b0ce4. Other known symptoms are:
assertion failed: store.cc:1793: "isEmpty()"
assertion failed: FwdState.cc:501: "serverConnection() == conn"
assertion failed: FwdState.cc:1037: "!opening()"
This change has several overlapping parts. Unfortunately, merging
individual parts is both difficult and likely to cause crashes.
..."
What do you think?
> Thanks in advance for your efforts, and best regards,
You're welcome!
> Peter Müller
Best,
Matthias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-10 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-10 17:25 Peter Müller
2022-02-10 18:00 ` Matthias Fischer [this message]
2022-02-11 8:39 ` Matthias Fischer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cdadb712-3e31-df90-12de-803543c137a8@ipfire.org \
--to=matthias.fischer@ipfire.org \
--cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox