Hi, it made absolutely NO difference. Binarys were identical, too. 'configure' contains: ... # Check whether --with-pthreads was given. if test "${with_pthreads+set}" = set; then : withval=$with_pthreads; else withval="yes" fi ... Can it be that its enabled automatically, if no option is given!? *sigh* Best, Matthias On 16.12.2016 17:42, Michael Tremer wrote: > On Fri, 2016-12-16 at 17:39 +0100, Matthias Fischer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As far as I can see, it uses one thread per processor as set through the >> init-file. >> >> Here, the generated 'tuning.conf' contains "num-threads: 2", which is >> ok, the machine has two cores. > > We always set that to the number of active processors, yes. > >> The question is, what differences would compiling with '--with-pthreads' >> make? This option came to my view, but I don't know if this would make >> anything better. > > Try it out them. The number of threads will be the same but it should definitely > use pthreads then which is the fastest implmentation of threads in Linux. There > is a few things outside glibc, but I cannot imagine that unbound is using > anything else but pthreads already. > > -Michael > >> >> Best, >> Matthias >> >> On 16.12.2016 17:13, Michael Tremer wrote: >> > >> > What else is it using for threading right now? >> > >> > On Fri, 2016-12-16 at 16:44 +0100, Matthias Fischer wrote: >> > > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > unbound 1.6.0 - with reverted commit - is running here since a few hours >> > > without seen problems so far - we'll see. >> > > >> > > One question, being curious: >> > > >> > > Could it make sense to compile 'unbound' using '--with-pthreads' for >> > > threading support? >> > > >> > > I got the following in '_build.ipfire.log' right now: >> > > >> > > ... >> > > checking for the pthreads library -lpthreads... no >> > > checking whether pthreads work without any flags... no >> > > checking whether pthreads work with -Kthread... no >> > > checking whether pthreads work with -kthread... no >> > > checking for the pthreads library -llthread... no >> > > checking whether pthreads work with -pthread... yes >> > > checking for joinable pthread attribute... PTHREAD_CREATE_JOINABLE >> > > checking if more special flags are required for pthreads... no >> > > checking for PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT... yes >> > > checking for pthread_spinlock_t... yes >> > > checking for pthread_rwlock_t... yes >> > > checking if -pthread unused during linking... no >> > > ... >> > > >> > > In this regard, I read >> > > https://www.unbound.net/documentation/howto_optimise.html, but I'm not >> > > so skilled in programming to judge whether this would lead to any >> > > advantages... >> > > >> > > Best, >> > > Matthias >> > > >> > > On 16.12.2016 12:59, Michael Tremer wrote: >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Hi, >> > > > >> > > > that server is not available from the internet. But that you get that IP >> > > > address >> > > > is enough for me. That didn't happen before. >> > > > >> > > > I will revert that commit and we will see in the testing if this raises >> > > > any >> > > > problems again... >> > > > >> > > > Best, >> > > > -Michael >> > > > >> > > > On Fri, 2016-12-16 at 12:47 +0100, Matthias Fischer wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Hi, >> > > > > >> > > > > On 16.12.2016 11:28, Michael Tremer wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Did you try reverting this one and test if things like >> > > > > > "pakfirehub01.i.ipfire.org" resolve again? >> > > > > >> > > > > I just tested after adding "qname-minimisation: yes" and >> > > > > "harden-below-nxdomain: yes" to '/etc/unbound/unbound.conf', but >> > > > > neither >> > > > > "pakfirehub01.i.ipfire.org" nor its ip-address "172.28.1.165" >> > > > > answered. >> > > > > >> > > > > No connection through browser, ping loss on both = 100%. >> > > > > >> > > > > With or without, I get the following answer with 'dig': >> > > > > >> > > > > ... >> > > > > root(a)ipfire: /etc/unbound # dig pakfirehub01.i.ipfire.org >> > > > > >> > > > > ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4 <<>> pakfirehub01.i.ipfire.org >> > > > > ;; global options: +cmd >> > > > > ;; Got answer: >> > > > > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 45016 >> > > > > ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: >> > > > > 1 >> > > > > >> > > > > ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: >> > > > > ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 >> > > > > ;; QUESTION SECTION: >> > > > > ;pakfirehub01.i.ipfire.org. IN A >> > > > > >> > > > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: >> > > > > pakfirehub01.i.ipfire.org. 293 IN A 172.28.1.165 >> > > > > >> > > > > ;; Query time: 0 msec >> > > > > ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) >> > > > > ;; WHEN: Fri Dec 16 12:33:28 CET 2016 >> > > > > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 70 >> > > > > ... >> > > > > >> > > > > Best, >> > > > > Matthias >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >