From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gerd Hoerst To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: Opinions on chrony? (was: Re: chrony) Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 11:21:47 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20201231123834.GA256852@vesikko.tarvainen.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8095590059242319347==" List-Id: --===============8095590059242319347== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi ! on my ipfire is use it since 4 or 5 weeks.. but i also have to use https://github.com/dorchain/dcfshm because i use a gude usb II dcf clock. (on my 2 raspberry pi=C2=A0 i use gpsd an pps signal) So do i have to create a second package for this ? Ciao Gerd Am 31.12.2020 um 13:38 schrieb Tapani Tarvainen: > I would prefer switching to chrony, primarily because it is indeed > better with intermittent connections. NTS would be nice, too, but > of little practical value at the moment. > > But I don't see it all that important or urgent, ntpd works well > enough for almost all, so I would not prioritize it very high. > > Tapani Tarvainen > > On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 11:56:21AM +0100, Peter M=C3=BCller (peter.mueller(= a)ipfire.org) wrote: >> Hello development folks, >> >> since Gerd has worked on chrony, which is believed to be more robust in ca= se of unstable >> internet connections (which possibly affects some IPFire users) than ntpd = is, I eventually >> thought whether or not replacing ntpd with chrony was worth the effort. >> >> Another motivation would be chrony's support for NTS, however, there is no= thing like a >> distributed NTS pool as of today. Cloudflare and Netnod are providing publ= ic NTS servers, >> and probably some others do so as well, but I really would like to have a = decentralised >> pool before switching to NTS. >> >> Any thoughts on this? >> >> Thanks, and best regards, >> Peter M=C3=BCller --===============8095590059242319347==--