public inbox for development@lists.ipfire.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Peter Müller" <peter.mueller@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: Various mount options have changed in Core Update 169
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:39:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4d05f31-c4f5-7054-db29-dd8ef7d9cc30@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B2FA8237-F7E4-42B3-AF7C-C800E776A7F4@ipfire.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3710 bytes --]

Hello Michael,

> Hello,
> 
>> On 22 Jun 2022, at 19:02, Peter Müller <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Michael,
>>
>> thanks for your reply.
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I suppose this is coming from changing dracut.
>>
>> As discussed on the phone already, I don't think dracut is the root cause here, since
>> the mount options are fine on systems running Core Update 168. Some change in Core Update
>> 169 caused this issue.
> 
> Okay. Could we please find out what has been causing this?

I am unfortunately out of ideas and need help here - see also the issue of /dev which is still
not fixed since I do not know where to look at. There is a mount call in /usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/99base/init.sh
with the proper options, but it either is not conducted at all during boot, or the mount options
get overwritten at a later point.

Sorry for the hassle.

> This is a change I would definitely care about and things like this should not just change.

Full ACK.

> 
>>
>>> Unless I am reading your diff wrong, those options have been added which is a good thing?!
>>
>> No, it is the other way round. Silly me screwed up the diff. :-/
>>
>> Anyway, commit 54bd60b67b477e5d5814293a74086dff1c21ac69 addresses all of them except for
>> /dev. I searched and was unable to find any component where /dev is (re)mounted in the way
>> it is shown in the output of "mount".

^^^

Thanks, and best regards,
Peter Müller

>>
>> Do you have any ideas?
>>
>> Thanks, and best regards,
>> Peter Müller
>>
>>>
>>> -Michael
>>>
>>>> On 20 Jun 2022, at 21:34, Peter Müller <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello *,
>>>>
>>>> while pre-testing Core Update 169, it came to my attention that, for some reason,
>>>> various mount options have changed since Core Update 168, lacking options such as
>>>> "nodev", "noexec", "nosuid", which means a security downgrade.
>>>>
>>>> The complete delta is as follows:
>>>>
>>>> $ diff -Naur before after
>>>> --- before	2022-06-20 20:04:32.436632074 +0000
>>>> +++ after	2022-06-20 20:04:34.500401575 +0000
>>>> @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
>>>> -devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,relatime,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000)
>>>> +devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,nosuid,noexec,relatime,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000)
>>>> /dev/sda1 on /boot type ext4 (rw,relatime)
>>>> /dev/sda2 on /boot/efi type vfat (rw,relatime,fmask=0022,dmask=0022,codepage=437,iocharset=ascii,shortname=mixed,errors=remount-ro)
>>>> /dev/sda4 on / type ext4 (rw,relatime)
>>>> -devtmpfs on /dev type devtmpfs (rw,relatime,size=1963708k,nr_inodes=490927,mode=755)
>>>> +devtmpfs on /dev type devtmpfs (rw,nosuid,noexec,size=1949992k,nr_inodes=487498,mode=755)
>>>> efivarfs on /sys/firmware/efi/efivars type efivarfs (rw,relatime)
>>>> none on /sys/fs/cgroup type cgroup2 (rw,relatime)
>>>> -/proc on /proc type proc (rw,relatime)
>>>> -/run on /run type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,size=8192k,mode=755)
>>>> -/sys on /sys type sysfs (rw,relatime)
>>>> -tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw,relatime)
>>>> +proc on /proc type proc (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime)
>>>> +sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime)
>>>> +tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec)
>>>> +tmpfs on /run type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,mode=755)
>>>> /var/lock on /var/lock type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,size=8192k)
>>>>
>>>> I cannot recall of having this explicitly changed anywhere, and don't understand
>>>> the root cause for this (unwanted) change. Could somebody please point me into the
>>>> right direction? :-)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance, and best regards,
>>>> Peter Müller
>>>
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2022-06-23 10:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-20 20:34 Peter Müller
2022-06-21  9:41 ` Michael Tremer
2022-06-22 18:02   ` Peter Müller
2022-06-23  8:52     ` Michael Tremer
2022-06-23 10:39       ` Peter Müller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d4d05f31-c4f5-7054-db29-dd8ef7d9cc30@ipfire.org \
    --to=peter.mueller@ipfire.org \
    --cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox