From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Adolf Belka (ipfire-dev)" To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: Fireperf: first tests an results Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:30:48 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0937125794769137323==" List-Id: --===============0937125794769137323== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, I tried to also test this out on my system. As I am not familiar with what all the command options do I just followed Dan= iels commands. server: IPFire 2.25 - Core Update 153; Intel Celeron CPU J1900 @ 1.99GHz x4; = I211 Gigabit Network Connection client: Arch Linux; Intel Core i5-8400 CPU @ 2.80GHz 6 core; 1GBit nic Server: fireperf -s -P 10000 -p 63000:630010 Client: fireperf -c -P 1 -x -p 63000:63010 where was replac= ed with the IP address of my IPFire Green connection. I started the server fireperf and there was the table updating regularly. I started the client and got "Could not open socket: Address family not suppo= rted by protocol" scrolling up the screen. I looked in the log (journalctl) but there were no messages at all related to= fireperf just the command being run. Any thoughts on what I am missing to have setup or installed? Regards, Adolf. On 09/02/2021 13:53, daniel.weismueller(a)ipfire.org wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > today I installed fireperf on my testing IPFire and my Ubuntu PC. > > server: IPFire Core 154; Intel i7 4790; Intel 82571EB/GB 1GBit Nic > Client: Ubuntu 20.4; Intel i7 9700; Intel i219-V 1GBit Nic > > Michael and I agreed that one more port should be opened per 5000 expected = connection per second (cps) > > So here my results: > > > Server: > fireperf -s -P 10000 -p 63000:630010 > > Client: > fireperf -c -P 1 -x -p 63000:63010 -> ~5000 cps > > fireperf -c -P 10 -x -p 63000:63010 -> ~30000-35000 cps > > fireperf -c -P 100 -x -p 63000:63010 -> ~35000-40000 cps > > fireperf -c -P 1000 -x -p 63000:63010 -> ~40000-45000 cps > > fireperf -c -P 10000 -x -p 63000:63010 -> ~46000-48000 cps > > The cpu utilization was limited to one core and increased in sync with the = cps on both sides. > > In my last test, the utilization was about 85-100% on the server and 75-95%= on the client. > > In the next days I will test our mini and post the results here. > > - > > Daniel > --===============0937125794769137323==--