From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Tremer To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: Core 122 updates Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 22:46:00 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1078782716598056958==" List-Id: --===============1078782716598056958== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Fred, yes, this might indeed be an issue. The updater will catch that and not install the update if not enough disk space is available on either / or /boot. So you can try, but it might make sense to reinstall or if you are very brave remove the old kernel and then install the update :) -Michael On Thu, 2018-08-02 at 14:57 -0400, Kienker, Fred wrote: > FYI =E2=80=93 some of the very old firewalls, installed long ago before the= re was an x86-64 version, have VERY small /boot partitions. This may pose iss= ues updating to Core 122. > =20 > This screen shot was taken from a very old IPFire system running the x586 v= ersion: > =20 > [root(a)fw ~]# df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > devtmpfs 1001M 4.0K 1001M 1% /dev > tmpfs 1006M 12K 1006M 1% /dev/shm > tmpfs 1006M 264K 1006M 1% /run > /dev/sda3 2.0G 1001M 840M 55% / > /dev/sda1 24M 18M 4.4M 81% /boot > /dev/sda4 71G 52G 16G 78% /var > none 8.0M 12K 8.0M 1% /var/lock > none 1006M 16K 1006M 1% /var/log/vnstat > none 1006M 32M 975M 4% /var/log/rrd > =20 > Note that the /boot partition is only 24M in total and has only 4.4M free. > =20 > Michael=E2=80=99s posting on the website about maybe it is time for a =E2= =80=9Cclean=E2=80=9D reinstall is very much to the point. But this is very ha= rd to do with these older systems. I=E2=80=99m not sure it is possible to ins= tall 122 then restore a backup from 120, but I may well be wrong. > Best regards, > Fred > =20 --===============1078782716598056958==--