From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail02.haj.ipfire.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail02.haj.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ZJbMN2xcWz330j for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2025 19:32:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail01.ipfire.org (mail01.haj.ipfire.org [172.28.1.202]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail01.haj.ipfire.org", Issuer "R10" (verified OK)) by mail02.haj.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZJbMJ60BSz2xMD for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2025 19:32:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail01.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ZJbMJ10y1z5hc for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2025 19:32:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfire.org; s=202003ed25519; t=1742499164; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nu9bgaCbDMPyuutD5P1l8X5ggTjR0QoUiMU0M/6DZAo=; b=8lYCdb07nA/rDBcq7M43eRhl1EnrMfbgKBEzgf+v8e2LkElEnUkU0MayvsbkVDoKS0Eru5 bqRzUSLwX7Q3OuAA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfire.org; s=202003rsa; t=1742499164; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nu9bgaCbDMPyuutD5P1l8X5ggTjR0QoUiMU0M/6DZAo=; b=m/f1Kaq0HC7dNi2hHqgOXUesJ/J4UPWRFJae76qdImatmhBuXzRkgTuqVqMkzuZFNbSKw2 nzS+lPvf4AvpskzSe9LpwsrneKyglq0CA39ijnerrzhT7Dxu8RW+XZ+t+GJ2zHcKAhWHcS tuxOI3ntsvmSE6FXrkTTcmmvZFUsEm0dPZPEJqcx63uk6BMeBoxipC2QUmjYBaKR7ITikm t//NA/lZF71rU7WyrrNiw3vdf66OtwTrC+RIruHwRNAam5o+p7P5utpYCzk47/L64XQpG/ s3ekpYVgXtzExUkw1NwjrzC1wmLbKom4J4CFByD98NencSx+VBUa523HE7aVGg== Message-ID: Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 20:32:43 +0100 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: Sender: Mail-Followup-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Advance Notification of Suricata 7.0.9 Content-Language: en-US To: development@lists.ipfire.org References: <999A6822-EBC4-44A6-970A-342641C813ED@ipfire.org> <4E7AA2E9-1A7F-45D3-B5ED-A0FE81319247@ipfire.org> <2e63b399-2b3e-4048-8897-3721add7936b@ipfire.org> <1b6934e0-1dc0-4c55-a919-240f24fac80a@ipfire.org> <8C89CA42-0F5A-49EC-92EA-7F93885AB030@ipfire.org> From: Matthias Fischer In-Reply-To: <8C89CA42-0F5A-49EC-92EA-7F93885AB030@ipfire.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, On 20.03.2025 18:42, Michael Tremer wrote: > Hello, > >> On 20 Mar 2025, at 17:01, Matthias Fischer wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 20.03.2025 17:19, Michael Tremer wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>>> On 19 Mar 2025, at 17:33, Matthias Fischer wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> One curiosity: >>>> >>>> I've just sent the updates for 'suricata 7.0.9' and 'libhtp 0.5.50' from >>>> my "Devel64-1" to development@lists.ipfire.org. >>>> I did this as always, per 'git send-email --annotate >>>> --smtp-domain=devel64-1.localdomain -2'. No problems occured. >>>> >>>> But I see these only on 'patchwork.ipfire.org' and 'git.ipfire.org'. I >>>> expected to get a mail on the list, as usual. But nothing happened, this >>>> patchset doesn't appear on the development-list. >>> >>> It is here: https://lists.ipfire.org/development/20250319161626.625056-1-matthias.fischer@ipfire.org/T/#m619f245177638f2d6ef7f05a5114b596360c6cb4 >>> >>> What is wrong with it? Where else are you expecting it? >> >> As I wrote: I expected to receive a *mail* with a subject like "[Patch >> 1/2] libhtp: Update ..." as usual and as seen on your link above. But >> there was no mail, so I wasn't sure if the patch had arrived. It had, as >> I saw in patchwork and git, but only there, not in my >> imap-development-inbox in Thunderbird. Thats all... ;-) > > Ah, yeah, the new mailing list does not send you a copy of your own email any more… > > I don’t think we can change this on a per-user basis, but we can globally. > > Is this breaking anything for you or just unexpected? > No, nothing breaked - it was just unexpected. And the mail copy was practical, because you don't have to check if the patch has arrived. Then again, why is it still working for Adolf? ;-) Best Matthias