From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ummeegge <ummeegge@ipfire.org>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject:
 Re: [PATCH] OpenVPN: Introduce Negotiable Crypto Parameters for roadwarriors
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 16:02:14 +0200
Message-ID: <e40e1d14ef0fd4a75bb30cea9a85b6847916d1f9.camel@ipfire.org>
In-Reply-To: <a79b295693da8841e12b91eaa79162edb3c354b5.camel@ipfire.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7873698217216000776=="
List-Id: <development.lists.ipfire.org>

--===============7873698217216000776==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi Michael,

Am Donnerstag, den 30.08.2018, 12:59 +0100 schrieb Michael Tremer:
> A very long discussion has been had about whether we should continue
> supporting
> OpenVPN and the majority of the arguments were against OpenVPN. On
> paper, it is
> just too broken; in the wrong hands and there were other reasons like
> "one VPN
> implementation is enough for a start", too.
OK haven´t heard about this discussion before but good to know now so i
will stop further development for OpenVPN.

> > Best,
> > 
> > Erik


--===============7873698217216000776==--