* Is/should efivar be a package?
@ 2022-09-12 9:51 Peter Müller
2022-09-12 10:07 ` Michael Tremer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Müller @ 2022-09-12 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: development
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 353 bytes --]
Hello *,
I just stumbled across this line in the efivar LFS file:
> VER = 38
Since the correspondent rootfile is in ~/config/rootfiles/common/, I guess
efivar is not a package, and this line can/should be removed. Same issue
applies to efibootmgr, by the way.
Am I mistaken here? Did I miss anything?
Thanks, and best regards,
Peter Müller
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Is/should efivar be a package?
2022-09-12 9:51 Is/should efivar be a package? Peter Müller
@ 2022-09-12 10:07 ` Michael Tremer
2022-09-12 10:48 ` Peter Müller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael Tremer @ 2022-09-12 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: development
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 603 bytes --]
Hello,
This is the version from upstream, and not PAK_VER.
> On 12 Sep 2022, at 11:51, Peter Müller <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>
> Hello *,
>
> I just stumbled across this line in the efivar LFS file:
>
>> VER = 38
>
> Since the correspondent rootfile is in ~/config/rootfiles/common/, I guess
> efivar is not a package, and this line can/should be removed. Same issue
> applies to efibootmgr, by the way.
We need this in the installer and GRUB needs it on EFI-based systems.
> Am I mistaken here? Did I miss anything?
Maybe :)
>
> Thanks, and best regards,
> Peter Müller
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Is/should efivar be a package?
2022-09-12 10:07 ` Michael Tremer
@ 2022-09-12 10:48 ` Peter Müller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Müller @ 2022-09-12 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: development
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 813 bytes --]
Hello Michael,
thanks for your reply.
Sigh, that was my improperly caffeinated self typing before thinking, again. :-/
Best,
Peter Müller
> Hello,
>
> This is the version from upstream, and not PAK_VER.
>
>> On 12 Sep 2022, at 11:51, Peter Müller <peter.mueller(a)ipfire.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hello *,
>>
>> I just stumbled across this line in the efivar LFS file:
>>
>>> VER = 38
>>
>> Since the correspondent rootfile is in ~/config/rootfiles/common/, I guess
>> efivar is not a package, and this line can/should be removed. Same issue
>> applies to efibootmgr, by the way.
>
> We need this in the installer and GRUB needs it on EFI-based systems.
>
>> Am I mistaken here? Did I miss anything?
>
> Maybe :)
>
>>
>> Thanks, and best regards,
>> Peter Müller
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-09-12 10:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-09-12 9:51 Is/should efivar be a package? Peter Müller
2022-09-12 10:07 ` Michael Tremer
2022-09-12 10:48 ` Peter Müller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox