From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adolf Belka To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: Test of cleanup branch Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 12:28:53 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5FCCF7CF-3438-4BCF-998A-FDA7ACD9A9A9@ipfire.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1629931546283717455==" List-Id: --===============1629931546283717455== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Michael, On 25/07/2024 10:44, Michael Tremer wrote: > Hello Adolf, >=20 > Thank you for getting back on this so quickly. >=20 > I suppose this also means that the ISO in the next branch boots just fine, = too? Yes, that is correct. I used the iso from the nightly next latest directory. = No problems with the install at all. This tested out raid and all 4 interfaces. Regards, Adolf. >=20 > Best, > -Michael >=20 >> On 25 Jul 2024, at 09:07, Adolf Belka wrote: >> >> Hi Michael, >> >> I installed CU188 from the nightly onto a vm system and looked though all = the WUI pages and everything looked fine. >> >> I then restored a CU187 backup from my testing and then checked the OpenVP= N RW and N2N. Both worked fine with no problems. Also the logging for that al= l worked with no problems. >> >> Also checked out the IPS, IP Blocklists, Firewall groups and rules, DNS ... >> >> Everything I have looked at shows no impact from the cleanup branch change= s. It looks good to me. >> >> Of course good for others to also evaluate. >> >> Regards, >> >> Adolf. >> >=20 --===============1629931546283717455==--