From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Larsen To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: Comments regarding the upgrade process Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:25:51 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1450824673.2928.25.camel@ipfire.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6615566213781276809==" List-Id: --===============6615566213781276809== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 23:51:13 +0100, Michael Tremer wrote: >> So, there will be more verbose output? > > Yes some. It will look like this: Well, that looks way more verbose =) >> > > PAKFIRE UPGR: We are going to install all packages listed >> > > above. >> > > PAKFIRE INFO: Is this okay? [y/N] >> > > >> > > --> Shouldn't the default be Yes? >> > >> > Why? >> >> Cause you would normally want to install the new packages? And >> maybe IPFire relies on the new versions? (I don't know how this is >> supposed >> to work) > > You are not asked if you want to install the core update. That will > always happen. This is just for the add-on packages. Of course you > would want to install them indeed. > > I basically thought that "n" is the safe option here and this is > usually the default. How do other package managers do this? I would > like this to be equal for better user experience. Once you are used to > these things... you know? I can't recall any other software where some situation like this would occur. In which cases would a user want to _NOT_ install some packages? What is more likely: A newbie that would need this or some advanced user? Lars --===============6615566213781276809==--