From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Larsen <larsen007@web.de>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Link the IPFire logo to ipfire.org
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 13:13:42 +0200
Message-ID: <op.xzyms4dqcahio0@atl-uetersen.atlantisgmbh.local>
In-Reply-To: <1433847735.25208.154.camel@ipfire.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6796166369108529377=="
List-Id: <development.lists.ipfire.org>

--===============6796166369108529377==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 13:02:15 +0200, Michael Tremer  
<michael.tremer(a)ipfire.org> wrote:

>> I do know that some have JS deactivated and don´t like it, but in this
>> case there is nothing lost.
>
> If someone disables JS they will already have issues with other parts of
> the web user interface and of course most of the "web 2.0".
>
>> Is there anything else wrong with using JS?
>
> Not in general. I just find it a rather complex solution for a simple
> problem. The plain HTML approach would be much better and work for those
> who disable JS, too.

But then you loose CSS, don´t you?
And if someone has actually disabled JS, they will notice other problems  
as you mentioned before, so it´s unlikely they will even noticed that they  
cannot click on the IPFire logo to get to the homepage.


Lars

--===============6796166369108529377==--