Ok, what would be the best way then? I don't want my efforts to be wasted, but am certainly not a C coder. On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:23:51 +0100, Michael Tremer wrote: > No, that code has been dropped and pakfire was rewritten in C and > Python. So there is no code shared. > > -Michael > > On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 17:22 +0100, Larsen wrote: >> Ah ok, found it. Thanks! >> >> Will the code from pakfire2 (if I change anything) be used for >> pakfire3 as >> well? >> >> >> Lars >> >> >> >> On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 16:52:31 +0100, Michael Tremer >> wrote: >> >> > Hey, >> > >> > what you are looking at there is the source code of Pakfire 3. The >> > code >> > of the version that is running in IPFire 2 is here: >> > >> > http://git.ipfire.org/?p=ipfire-2.x.git;a=tree;f=src/pakfire;h=4894 >> > 6826ad9888dd39760783268566fe904de70d;hb=HEAD >> > >> > -Michael >> > >> > On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 16:13 +0100, Larsen wrote: >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > I wanted to see if I could add a command line parameter to tell >> > > pakfire to >> > > be more verbose, instead of silently putting its output into >> > > "/var/log/pakfire/update-core-upgrade-##.log". >> > > I have cloned the repository >> > > https://github.com/ipfire/pakfire.git bu >> > > t >> > > cannot find one of the other params (non-interactive, no-colors) >> > > in >> > > the >> > > code. >> > > >> > > What am I doing wrong? >> > > >> > > >> > > Lars