From: Rob Brewer <ipfire-devel@grantura.co.uk>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: Feedback on problems with Core Update 168 Testing
Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 10:48:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <t5nttc$pnj$1@tuscan3.grantura.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <t5mhvc$vk$1@tuscan3.grantura.co.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2525 bytes --]
On Friday 13 May 2022 22:18 Rob Brewer wrote:
> On Friday 13 May 2022 21:36 Michael Tremer wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>> On 13 May 2022, at 16:02, Rob Brewer <ipfire-devel(a)grantura.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thursday 12 May 2022 14:15 Rob Brewer wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thursday 12 May 2022 13:51 Michael Tremer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello Rob,
>>>>>
>>>>> You seem to already have lost the kernel there which is not part of
>>>>> 168.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you extract any log files from /var/log/pakfire?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Michael
>>>>>
>>>> I was upgrading 165-168 so I think Linux 5.15.23-ipfire was from 165.
>>>> I am trying to build a bootable USB drive so I can mount the ssd and
>>>> look at the Pakfire logs.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rob
>>>>
>>> I have been unable to boot from a usb drive so I re-fitted an old mSATA
>>> SSD with an earlier version of IPFIRE and was surprisingly unable to
>>> boot from there also.
>>>
>>> On investigation the bios is reporting:
>>>
>>> SeaBIOS (version rel-1.14.0.1-0-g8610266a)
>>>
>>> yet I manually upgraded it to v4.16.0.2 a few weeks ago after a
>>> discussion with Bernard.
>>>
>>> https://community.ipfire.org/t/entropy-with-new-apu-firmware/7707
>>>
>>> Could something have downgraded or corrupted the BIOS?
>>
>> No, we never touch this as it is too unpredictable what would happen.
>>
>>> I'll try to re-flash back to v4.16.0.2 if I can and try to boot again.
>>
>> But that is not the same version number that you are comparing there.
>>
>> SeaBIOS is a part of the firmware and comes in a different version.
>
> Yes sorry the BIOS version was a red-herring. When I eventually could boot
> from USB I could see that the correct BIOS version was displayed on the
> boot screen.
>
> My problem seems to be that grub hasn't been correctly updated to load the
> current kernel.
>
On checking the pakfire log files it would seem that grub wasn't updated
after kernel 5.15.35 was introduced in core 167.
I suspect this was caused by a failure in 'dracut' :
tail update-core-upgrade-167.log
dracut: Executing: /usr/bin/dracut --kver=5.15.35-ipfire --force
dracut: *** Including module: modsign ***
dracut: *** Including module: i18n ***
dracut: *** Including module: dm ***
dracut: Skipping udev rule: 64-device-mapper.rules
dracut: Skipping udev rule: 60-persistent-storage-dm.rules
dracut: Skipping udev rule: 55-dm.rules
dracut: *** Including module: kernel-modules ***
I presume this should have updated grub but dracut is new to me so I'm not
sure what to expect here!
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-14 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <64D90667-4C2C-4D88-A1D5-D6F961F212AB@gmail.com>
2022-05-11 19:08 ` Adolf Belka
2022-05-12 9:13 ` Michael Tremer
2022-05-12 10:43 ` Rob Brewer
2022-05-12 12:51 ` Michael Tremer
2022-05-12 13:15 ` Rob Brewer
2022-05-13 15:02 ` Rob Brewer
2022-05-13 17:16 ` Rob Brewer
2022-05-13 20:36 ` Michael Tremer
2022-05-13 21:18 ` Rob Brewer
2022-05-14 9:48 ` Rob Brewer [this message]
2022-05-12 11:25 ` Adolf Belka
2022-05-12 12:53 ` Michael Tremer
2022-05-12 20:10 ` Adolf Belka
2022-05-13 10:09 ` Michael Tremer
2022-05-13 13:59 ` Adolf Belka
2022-05-13 17:12 ` Adolf Belka
2022-05-13 20:37 ` Michael Tremer
2022-05-17 8:09 ` Adolf Belka
2022-05-18 11:04 ` Adolf Belka
2022-05-18 17:52 ` Peter Müller
2022-05-30 18:57 ` Peter Müller
2022-05-19 8:59 ` Michael Tremer
2022-05-19 10:57 ` Adolf Belka
2022-05-19 11:14 ` Michael Tremer
2022-05-19 11:21 ` Adolf Belka
2022-05-19 11:33 ` Michael Tremer
2022-05-19 20:10 ` Adolf Belka
[not found] <45b96c57-bb83-40f6-d60a-2a220672933e@ipfire.org>
2022-06-01 9:42 ` Michael Tremer
2022-06-04 8:48 ` Peter Müller
2022-05-11 13:11 Adolf Belka
2022-05-11 13:26 ` Leo Hofmann
2022-05-11 14:00 ` Adolf Belka
2022-05-11 14:19 ` Adolf Belka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='t5nttc$pnj$1@tuscan3.grantura.co.uk' \
--to=ipfire-devel@grantura.co.uk \
--cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox