From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bernhard Bitsch <Bernhard.Bitsch@gmx.de>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Aw: Re: Re: Should we block DoH by default?
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 17:06:24 +0100
Message-ID:
 <trinity-21efe4ee-9c48-4e90-a89d-5fe5f7bad82b-1583251584840@3c-app-gmx-bap01>
In-Reply-To: <20200303155517.GF31441@tehanu.it.jyu.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5679412674218033997=="
List-Id: <development.lists.ipfire.org>

--===============5679412674218033997==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



> Gesendet: Dienstag, 03. M=C3=A4rz 2020 um 16:55 Uhr
> Von: "Tapani Tarvainen" <ipfire(a)tapanitarvainen.fi>
> An: development(a)lists.ipfire.org
> Betreff: Re: Re: Should we block DoH by default?
>=20
> That is different: again, as sysadmin I may want to enforce such
> rules inside my net, one way or the other.
>=20
> Perhaps I should also note that Firefox allows you to choose your own
> DoH server, you don't have to use Mozilla or Cloudflare or whatever,
> and at some point it might be good to have DoH server built into
> IPFire.
>

To clarify from my side. It's not DoH that brought up the discussion, but the=
 decision of Mozilla to enable it by default "silently".

- Bernhard=20


--===============5679412674218033997==--