public inbox for development@lists.ipfire.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bernhard Bitsch <Bernhard.Bitsch@gmx.de>
To: development@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Aw: Re: IPFire 2.17 - Core Update 91 release schedule
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 15:55:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <trinity-e47411eb-c4db-4e18-aa14-4bd4d47ceac6-1434030956806@3capp-gmx-bs26> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1434015960.25208.221.camel@ipfire.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3218 bytes --]

Hi,

a thread in the forum showed up a little issue in our tests.
Some parts, don't know how many, just have a status of "untouched for a long time".
This is mainly true for Perl scripts in the WUI.
I would be a big effort to check all this files.
But some issues will come in sight, if at least during test period these files contain the lines

use strict;
use warnings;
use CGI::Carp 'fatalsToBrowser';

Perl does tolerate so much dirty coding. In such cases it isn't sure whether the intentions of the programmer meet the interpretation of the interpreter.
These three lines force a check and log possible errors to the WUI.

I fear, without these statements a couple of faulty test cases are reported as error-free.

Bernhard

> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Juni 2015 um 11:46 Uhr
> Von: "Michael Tremer" <michael.tremer(a)ipfire.org>
> An: "Jan Lentfer" <Jan.Lentfer(a)web.de>
> Cc: "development(a)lists.ipfire.org" <development(a)lists.ipfire.org>
> Betreff: Re: IPFire 2.17 - Core Update 91 release schedule
>
> Hello,
> 
> just follow this guide:
> 
> http://wiki.ipfire.org/en/configuration/ipfire/pakfire/testing
> 
> -Michael
> 
> On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 11:44 +0200, Jan Lentfer wrote:
> > Hi, could you shortly describe (possibly once more) how can follow the testing branch instead of the stable branch? TIA Jan
> > 
> > Von meinem iPad gesendet
> > 
> > > Am 11.06.2015 um 10:51 schrieb Michael Tremer <michael.tremer(a)ipfire.org>:
> > > 
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > I just wanted to update you quickly about the upcoming Core Update 91
> > > release plan.
> > > 
> > > There will be a new OpenSSL release at some time today (Thursday) which
> > > fixes several security vulnerabilities in this library. We do not know
> > > much about the severity of those vulnerabilities, yet, but we will
> > > release a new Core Update any ways.
> > > 
> > > The changes that have been pushed into the next branch will be released
> > > as well with an exception of Python. The Python package won't build on
> > > some systems and due to lack of time to debug this properly the Python
> > > update has been postponed.
> > > 
> > > As soon as the OpenSSL update is released we will start the build. We
> > > expect this to be late at night (as it has been in the past) and
> > > therefore the will be a build available Friday morning/noon European
> > > time. The ARM build will take much longer to complete though.
> > > 
> > > We will push that build to the testing tree so that as many people can
> > > help testing as possibly can.
> > > 
> > > If everything goes well we intend to release the final update 24 hours
> > > after that - which will be Saturday some time after mid day.
> > > 
> > > Best,
> > > -Michael
> > > 
> > > P.S. I was asked to send a short release plan for Core Updates on this
> > > list because it is not so easy to find out what the current status is
> > > sometimes. I would like your feedback about if this is a good idea and
> > > if this is helping. I am hoping that it is helping us to engage more
> > > testers into the testing procedure of new Core Updates and let you plan
> > > some time for doing that.
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-11 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <6A691F9C-E1A7-480E-8D1E-12A37DD544C8@web.de>
2015-06-11  9:46 ` Michael Tremer
2015-06-11 13:55   ` Bernhard Bitsch [this message]
2015-06-11 21:37     ` perl code cleanup (was: IPFire 2.17 - Core Update 91 release schedule) Michael Tremer
2015-06-12 10:31       ` Aw: " Bernhard Bitsch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=trinity-e47411eb-c4db-4e18-aa14-4bd4d47ceac6-1434030956806@3capp-gmx-bs26 \
    --to=bernhard.bitsch@gmx.de \
    --cc=development@lists.ipfire.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox