I'm with John on this one, the modified version is inferior. I get that 
we need to be conscious of color-blindness, but the new version doesn't 
work for anyone. May I suggest:

Green Checkmark: Very well supported.
Empty Yellow Circle: Basic Support.
Red "X": Does not work.
Universal Prohibition Symbol: Does not work and no support planned.

Tom

On 09/05/2019 4:52 PM, Jon Murphy wrote:
> Honestly?  I think it is too 'flat' and lacks color.  The original table was almost perfect.
> 
> 
> Suggestions:
> 
> Use Harvey balls - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvey_balls
> -or-
> Use Okto symbols - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Okta
> -or-
> Something similar to Consumer Reports rating symbols:
> https://www.consumerreports.org/video/view/inside-labs/5131824875001/our-ratings--consumer-reports/
> 
> 
> And it should include color.  <—-- One of those things we disagree on
> 
> EDIT - added mailing list.
> 
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Yes, I think this works. What do you think?
>>
>> -Michael
>>
>>> On 3 Sep 2019, at 23:19, Jon Murphy <jcmurphy26(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Michael - Is this what you are looking for?
>>>
>>>
>>> https://wiki.ipfire.org/hardware/arm/playground
>>>
>>> It is split into three different Tables:
>>> 	• Well Supported (was green before)
>>> 	• Basic support (was yellow before)
>>> 	• 'Does not work' and 'Does not work and no support planned' (was red and black before)
>>>
>>> Here is the old page with colors:
>>> https://wiki.ipfire.org/hardware/arm
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I’ll begin to remove the color/span code.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe we should have a list at the top with supported boards and then the second half of the page can be the non-supported boards?
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Documentation mailing list
> Documentation(a)lists.ipfire.org
> https://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/documentation
>