On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 17:53 +0100, WhyTea wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> 
> if you think we don't need the disclaimer delete it. ;)

Just wanted to know if there are some other reasons that I might have
missed.

> 
> In my opinion it is easier to use/read if in every wiki the installation 
> part is included.
> I don't like inkomplete wikis so I've to read several wikis if I want to 
> install one thing.

Well, if a user has done this one time, he would know how to install a
package. So most users skip that part and go on with the rest. I think
wiki articles should be to the point. We must require some kind of
knowledge of the reader and if he misses anything, there is still a
search function or the forums.

> 
> I will reduce the screenshots in size and colordeph so the loadtime will 
> get better.

Reduce the size with the implemented function in the wiki. Do not
reupload images and NEVER upload images in a bad quality. The wiki
resizes the images by itself and uses compression as well.

No comment on the rest?

 -Michael

> 
> Daniel
> 
> Am 17.01.2012 17:29, schrieb Michael Tremer:
> > Hello,
> >
> > my advice for faster way of fixing mistakes:
> > Choose a language to start with (this is preferably English) and
> > then write the article. Create an outline, write chapters, add
> > screenshots...
> > Get as much feedback as you can get. Do the guide by the shown
> > steps and check for errors. THEN translate.
> >
> > It's just easier if you don't need to fix minor issues in multiple
> > versions.
> >
> > ----
> >
> > On the text itself. You guys need to fix the screenshot sizes. The page
> > loads a while and the screenshots are that huge that you cannot tell
> > where text is and where just crap is. Crop the stuff that does not
> > matter (e.g. services screenshot) and use thumbnails.
> >
> > I would like to see the user pointed on how to create a samba share (bit
> > more detailed though). You mentioned WinSCP which is specific to Windows
> > and not very comfortable to use. Not sure if that is an option for
> > anybody.
> >
> > I think we do not need the disclaimer. In our law, even ping, telnet and
> > nmap are illegal tools and it's up to the user what he is going to do
> > with transmission. Bittorrent by itself is not illegal.
> >
> > Furthermore, why do we have a huge "installation section" on every
> > article? It is always the same. Why not create a very detailed guide and
> > always refer to it and tell the names of the packages to install?
> >
> > Altogether the article is quite nice and to the point. One could collect
> > some links to the official transmission documentation for further
> > reading.
> >
> >   -Michael
> >
> > On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 13:39 +0100, Florian Ortmann wrote:
> >> Hi Erik,
> >> currently I've a little problem. My Fire doesn't at the moment and
> >> I've no time to fix it. So it would be nice if someone other could
> >> make a picture.
> >>
> >>
> >> Flo
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Documentation mailing list
> >> Documentation(a)lists.ipfire.org
> >> http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/documentation
> > _______________________________________________
> > Documentation mailing list
> > Documentation(a)lists.ipfire.org
> > http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/documentation
> _______________________________________________
> Documentation mailing list
> Documentation(a)lists.ipfire.org
> http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/documentation