Re: [Documentation] Kernel choice in IPFire 3.x

[Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1520 bytes --]

Hey Daniel,

thank you for your reply.

Do you have any suggestion for the name of the "default" kernel?

I think it is not that bad because that kernel runs by "default" on any
i686 box. But there may be better names around.

Michael

P.S. Make sure you reply to Arne and Ben as well, because they have not
subscribed to this list.

On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 08:32 +0100, Daniel Weismüller wrote:
> Hi!
> Good work at all. I think it is easy to understand why it is necessary 
> to use different kernels.
> 
> Only one point. In my opinion it is a bad choice to name the "i686 
> non-pae kernel" "default kernel" because it isn't our default kernel for 
> the i686 architecture.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> Am 18.01.2012 23:12, schrieb Michael Tremer:
> > Hello you 2,
> >
> > I would like you to review the documentation I have written about the
> > kernel choice in IPFire 3.x at http://wiki.ipfire.org/devel/kernels.
> >
> > We should just briefly write down why we decided to do things in this
> > way and I want to make sure that I did not get anything wrong or missed
> > an important reason.
> >
> >   -Michael
> >
> > P.S. Please make sure to reply to the list as well.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Documentation mailing list
> > Documentation(a)lists.ipfire.org
> > http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/documentation
> _______________________________________________
> Documentation mailing list
> Documentation(a)lists.ipfire.org
> http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/documentation