From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
To: documentation@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: [Documentation] Kernel choice in IPFire 3.x
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:36:24 +0100
Message-ID: <1327152984.2165.83.camel@rice-oxley.tremer.info>
In-Reply-To: <1327077508.2165.67.camel@rice-oxley.tremer.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9174814703135059974=="
List-Id: <documentation.lists.ipfire.org>

--===============9174814703135059974==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I think I got it:

What do you think about "-legacy"? A good German translation would be
"Altlast" and that's exactly what it is without sounding too bad.

If we would call it "-outdated" or "-unsecure", nobody would want to
install it and I think a legacy kernel is not too bad.

 -Michael

On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 17:38 +0100, Michael Tremer wrote:
> Hey,
>=20
> I do not think that -rrf is quite intuitive.
>=20
>  -Michael
>=20
> P.S. Please subscribe to the list if you reply to mails. I won't approve
> mails any longer.
>=20
> On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 17:22 +0100, Ben Schweikert wrote:
> > What about Kernel-rrf? Reduced Range of functions?
> > Ben
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > Am 20.01.2012 um 17:13 schrieb Michael Tremer <michael.tremer(a)ipfire.or=
g>:
> >=20
> > > Hey,
> > >=20
> > > I think that is quite long, but actually when I was talking to Arne, he
> > > came up with the following idea:
> > >=20
> > > Why name the PAE-kernel kernel-PAE when PAE is only one of the features
> > > it comes with and is the default one. It would be much better to call if
> > > the default kernel. Nothing else.
> > >=20
> > > That would imply that we need to rename the other version, which is a
> > > bit hard to do, because I have not found a simply and cheesy name that
> > > is to the point. Any suggestions?
> > >=20
> > > -Michael
> > >=20
> > > On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 14:12 +0100, Daniel Weism=C3=BCller wrote:
> > >> Hi
> > >>=20
> > >> Why you just name it "without-PAE"
> > >>=20
> > >> Daniel
> > >>=20
> > >> Am 19.01.2012 12:46, schrieb Michael Tremer:
> > >>> Hey Daniel,
> > >>>=20
> > >>> thank you for your reply.
> > >>>=20
> > >>> Do you have any suggestion for the name of the "default" kernel?
> > >>>=20
> > >>> I think it is not that bad because that kernel runs by "default" on a=
ny
> > >>> i686 box. But there may be better names around.
> > >>>=20
> > >>> Michael
> > >>>=20
> > >>> P.S. Make sure you reply to Arne and Ben as well, because they have n=
ot
> > >>> subscribed to this list.
> > >>>=20
> > >>> On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 08:32 +0100, Daniel Weism=C3=BCller wrote:
> > >>>> Hi!
> > >>>> Good work at all. I think it is easy to understand why it is necessa=
ry
> > >>>> to use different kernels.
> > >>>>=20
> > >>>> Only one point. In my opinion it is a bad choice to name the "i686
> > >>>> non-pae kernel" "default kernel" because it isn't our default kernel=
 for
> > >>>> the i686 architecture.
> > >>>>=20
> > >>>> Daniel
> > >>>>=20
> > >>>> Am 18.01.2012 23:12, schrieb Michael Tremer:
> > >>>>> Hello you 2,
> > >>>>>=20
> > >>>>> I would like you to review the documentation I have written about t=
he
> > >>>>> kernel choice in IPFire 3.x at http://wiki.ipfire.org/devel/kernels.
> > >>>>>=20
> > >>>>> We should just briefly write down why we decided to do things in th=
is
> > >>>>> way and I want to make sure that I did not get anything wrong or mi=
ssed
> > >>>>> an important reason.
> > >>>>>=20
> > >>>>>   -Michael
> > >>>>>=20
> > >>>>> P.S. Please make sure to reply to the list as well.
> > >>>>>=20
> > >>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>> Documentation mailing list
> > >>>>> Documentation(a)lists.ipfire.org
> > >>>>> http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/documentation
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> Documentation mailing list
> > >>>> Documentation(a)lists.ipfire.org
> > >>>> http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/documentation
> > >=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Documentation mailing list
> Documentation(a)lists.ipfire.org
> http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/documentation


--===============9174814703135059974==--