From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
To: documentation@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: [Documentation] new list in bugzilla
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:43:03 +0100
Message-ID: <1331044983.10879.0.camel@rice-oxley.tremer.info>
In-Reply-To: <4F561E7E.3020807@ipfire.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6277568054250394319=="
List-Id: <documentation.lists.ipfire.org>

--===============6277568054250394319==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

You didn't misunderstand anything. That was what I thought. I am totally
fine with the Documentation team using Bugzilla.

So go for it.

Michael

On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 15:26 +0100, Daniel Weismüller wrote:
> oh ok! Sorry I've misunderstood it!
> 
> Did you have an alternative idea?
> 
> - Daniel
> 
> Am 06.03.2012 09:48, schrieb Michael Tremer:
> > Hello Daniel,
> >
> > I thought this was going to be just experimental for a while. Maybe the
> > overhead a bugtracker requires is too much for the simpler documentation
> > tasks.
> >
> > Anyway, I like the way to introduce a more strict way how to deal with
> > the issues. Good.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 08:05 +0100, Daniel Weismüller wrote:
> >> Hello!
> >> In bugziila we now have our own "buglist".
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.ipfire.org/describecomponents.cgi
> >>
> >> The idea is that every one of us may write down what should be done and
> >> we are able to assign it to someone.
> >> Further we have quick overview of the work that must be done.
> >>
> >> What you think about it?
> >>
> >> - Daniel
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Documentation mailing list
> > Documentation(a)lists.ipfire.org
> > http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/documentation
> 


--===============6277568054250394319==--