Any reason why this discussion has ended without a result? Are there any suggestions/opinions about the proposed workflow? Can't believe that there is nothing to talk about... -Michael On Sat, 2013-07-13 at 18:20 +0200, Michael Tremer wrote: > On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 17:55 +0100, Aaron Philpott wrote: > > I figure now is the point that I should input somewhat into Michael's > > thoughts on the Wiki and documentation. > > > > > > For those of you who don't me, I'm Aaron (AzzyChill) online and have > > created one video on IPFire with the plan to develop more in future. > > I am relatively new to the IPFire project having only really used > > Untangle for my corporate clients due to its ease of use for both me > > as an IT support person and my clients as end users of the system I > > install. > > Welcome :) > > > I mentioned recently in my regular Brew Time segments that IPFire is > > an amazing project but the support available isn't as good as it could > > be and so it could put a lot of people off, both seasoned IT > > professionals and noobs who are going into IT pretty clueless as to > > what they're doing. > > What made me realize that we have to do more about documentation and > these things was seeing you being confused about how to install IPFire. > It's not that you don't have the general knowledge about how to do > things, but of course you don't have a clue *where* to start when you > install IPFire for the first time. > > Being not too noob-friendly is okay and to some extend I think we should > not be too noob-friendly because firewalls are not for noobs. > But lacking essential information for all other people who start with > IPFire is not okay. > > > I pretty much agree with everything that Michael has said including > > the bits about language. I am from the UK and hence English is my > > native language, due to failings in the education system of the UK it > > is also my only language. One would assume that most residents of > > Germany speak English as well and so starting from English probably > > isn't a bad idea. But language links in with the end plan and the > > future for IPFire because currently the majority of your users are > > based in Germany and speak German and so it would make sense to write > > everything in German and then translate it to other languages. But if > > the plan is to try and expand the project to other markets > > internationally English would be the best language to use because it > > is an international language. > > That's exactly the point and I don't understand all the fuzz about the > language. People in America and the UK speak English. Nothing else. > All the rest of Europe and the Americas and parts of Asia are used to > communicate in English (at least reading). > All other Open Source projects are in English. There is not a single > major project I know that is not running in English. > > And English is also the language for development in the IPFire project. > We use it in Bugzilla, we use it on our mailing lists, we use it > everywhere. The majority of the people who use IPFire is not from > Germany, so there is absolutely no point in choosing any other language > than English. > > -Michael > > > _______________________________________________ > Documentation mailing list > Documentation(a)lists.ipfire.org > http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/documentation