Re: New wiki painful to use

[Jon Murphy <jcmurphy26@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1344 bytes --]

Honestly?  I think it is too 'flat' and lacks color.  The original table was almost perfect.


Suggestions:

Use Harvey balls - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvey_balls
-or-
Use Okto symbols - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Okta
-or-
Something similar to Consumer Reports rating symbols:
https://www.consumerreports.org/video/view/inside-labs/5131824875001/our-ratings--consumer-reports/


And it should include color.  <—-- One of those things we disagree on

EDIT - added mailing list.

> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Yes, I think this works. What do you think?
> 
> -Michael
> 
>> On 3 Sep 2019, at 23:19, Jon Murphy <jcmurphy26(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Michael - Is this what you are looking for?
>> 
>> 
>> https://wiki.ipfire.org/hardware/arm/playground
>> 
>> It is split into three different Tables:
>> 	• Well Supported (was green before)
>> 	• Basic support (was yellow before)
>> 	• 'Does not work' and 'Does not work and no support planned' (was red and black before)
>> 
>> Here is the old page with colors:
>> https://wiki.ipfire.org/hardware/arm
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>>> I’ll begin to remove the color/span code.
>>> 
>>> Thank you.
>>> 
>>> Maybe we should have a list at the top with supported boards and then the second half of the page can be the non-supported boards?
>>> 
>> 
>