From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel =?utf-8?q?Weism=C3=BCller?= <whytea@ipfire.org>
To: documentation@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: [Documentation] Kernel choice in IPFire 3.x
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:32:11 +0100
Message-ID: <4F17C6FB.3010406@ipfire.org>
In-Reply-To: <1326924746.2165.50.camel@rice-oxley.tremer.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7515423760739503541=="
List-Id: <documentation.lists.ipfire.org>

--===============7515423760739503541==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi!
Good work at all. I think it is easy to understand why it is necessary 
to use different kernels.

Only one point. In my opinion it is a bad choice to name the "i686 
non-pae kernel" "default kernel" because it isn't our default kernel for 
the i686 architecture.

Daniel

Am 18.01.2012 23:12, schrieb Michael Tremer:
> Hello you 2,
>
> I would like you to review the documentation I have written about the
> kernel choice in IPFire 3.x at http://wiki.ipfire.org/devel/kernels.
>
> We should just briefly write down why we decided to do things in this
> way and I want to make sure that I did not get anything wrong or missed
> an important reason.
>
>   -Michael
>
> P.S. Please make sure to reply to the list as well.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Documentation mailing list
> Documentation(a)lists.ipfire.org
> http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/documentation

--===============7515423760739503541==--