From: "Daniel Weismüller" <whytea@ipfire.org>
To: documentation@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: [Documentation] Kernel choice in IPFire 3.x
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:12:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F1816B4.3000202@ipfire.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1326973617.2165.52.camel@rice-oxley.tremer.info>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1646 bytes --]
Hi
Why you just name it "without-PAE"
Daniel
Am 19.01.2012 12:46, schrieb Michael Tremer:
> Hey Daniel,
>
> thank you for your reply.
>
> Do you have any suggestion for the name of the "default" kernel?
>
> I think it is not that bad because that kernel runs by "default" on any
> i686 box. But there may be better names around.
>
> Michael
>
> P.S. Make sure you reply to Arne and Ben as well, because they have not
> subscribed to this list.
>
> On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 08:32 +0100, Daniel Weismüller wrote:
>> Hi!
>> Good work at all. I think it is easy to understand why it is necessary
>> to use different kernels.
>>
>> Only one point. In my opinion it is a bad choice to name the "i686
>> non-pae kernel" "default kernel" because it isn't our default kernel for
>> the i686 architecture.
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>> Am 18.01.2012 23:12, schrieb Michael Tremer:
>>> Hello you 2,
>>>
>>> I would like you to review the documentation I have written about the
>>> kernel choice in IPFire 3.x at http://wiki.ipfire.org/devel/kernels.
>>>
>>> We should just briefly write down why we decided to do things in this
>>> way and I want to make sure that I did not get anything wrong or missed
>>> an important reason.
>>>
>>> -Michael
>>>
>>> P.S. Please make sure to reply to the list as well.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Documentation mailing list
>>> Documentation(a)lists.ipfire.org
>>> http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/documentation
>> _______________________________________________
>> Documentation mailing list
>> Documentation(a)lists.ipfire.org
>> http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/documentation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-19 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-18 22:12 Michael Tremer
2012-01-19 7:32 ` Daniel Weismüller
2012-01-19 11:46 ` Michael Tremer
2012-01-19 13:12 ` Daniel Weismüller [this message]
2012-01-20 16:13 ` Michael Tremer
2012-01-20 16:22 ` Ben Schweikert
2012-01-20 16:38 ` Michael Tremer
2012-01-21 13:36 ` Michael Tremer
[not found] <CAO6L5t8LWpMhZfeyfBu-HttU5g6OoB_6t5Mxvzp89sDxDNHmOA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-01-23 15:31 ` Michael Tremer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F1816B4.3000202@ipfire.org \
--to=whytea@ipfire.org \
--cc=documentation@lists.ipfire.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox