Hi

Why you just name it "without-PAE"

Daniel

Am 19.01.2012 12:46, schrieb Michael Tremer:
> Hey Daniel,
>
> thank you for your reply.
>
> Do you have any suggestion for the name of the "default" kernel?
>
> I think it is not that bad because that kernel runs by "default" on any
> i686 box. But there may be better names around.
>
> Michael
>
> P.S. Make sure you reply to Arne and Ben as well, because they have not
> subscribed to this list.
>
> On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 08:32 +0100, Daniel Weismüller wrote:
>> Hi!
>> Good work at all. I think it is easy to understand why it is necessary
>> to use different kernels.
>>
>> Only one point. In my opinion it is a bad choice to name the "i686
>> non-pae kernel" "default kernel" because it isn't our default kernel for
>> the i686 architecture.
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>> Am 18.01.2012 23:12, schrieb Michael Tremer:
>>> Hello you 2,
>>>
>>> I would like you to review the documentation I have written about the
>>> kernel choice in IPFire 3.x at http://wiki.ipfire.org/devel/kernels.
>>>
>>> We should just briefly write down why we decided to do things in this
>>> way and I want to make sure that I did not get anything wrong or missed
>>> an important reason.
>>>
>>>    -Michael
>>>
>>> P.S. Please make sure to reply to the list as well.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Documentation mailing list
>>> Documentation(a)lists.ipfire.org
>>> http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/documentation
>> _______________________________________________
>> Documentation mailing list
>> Documentation(a)lists.ipfire.org
>> http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/documentation