Re: [Documentation] Performance leaks with passive network interface cards

["Daniel Weismüller" <whytea@ipfire.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1646 bytes --]

Hey it's a wiki. Everyone could change things. So if you find something 
feel free to change it. ;)

btw. I don't know which vendor provide their own drivers.

- Daniel

Am 14.02.2012 20:09, schrieb Michael Tremer:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to see the "we recommend" message changed. It is much
> better to write "which hardware is worth a recommendation" because there
> is no "we".
>
> An also not so good point is the table at the bottom of the page. It
> would be much better to add this information to the table over here
> (http://wiki.ipfire.org/en/hardware/networking). It is not very easy to
> maintain redundant information and it is also not very easy for the user
> to join all this information together. You know what I mean...
>
> Another side node would also be interesting. You should consider adding
> this: Vendors of hardware with controller chips provide their own
> drivers in the kernel (Intel, etc.). Most of the cheaper ones do not and
> so the quality is not as good as the first ones.
>
> Michael
>
> On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 19:10 +0100, WhyTea wrote:
>> Hi again!
>>
>> I've imported the german and the english version into the wiki.
>>
>> http://wiki.ipfire.org/de/hardware/passivenics
>> http://wiki.ipfire.org/en/hardware/passivenics
>>
>> Please take a look.
>>
>> - Daniel
>> _______________________________________________
>> Documentation mailing list
>> Documentation(a)lists.ipfire.org
>> http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/documentation
> _______________________________________________
> Documentation mailing list
> Documentation(a)lists.ipfire.org
> http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/documentation