From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: 5p9 <5p9@ipfire.org>
To: documentation@lists.ipfire.org
Subject: Re: Cryptography
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 15:25:29 +0100
Message-ID: <52F39B59.1020400@ipfire.org>
In-Reply-To: <52F398ED.2080901@rymes.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8183557392565128400=="
List-Id: <documentation.lists.ipfire.org>

--===============8183557392565128400==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

statement of Tom is good, just that there are examples for this?
> That way a user could still use those methods if required for
> interoperability

I think, a general overview is good. It can be transferred easily with
respect to the fire.

5p9


Am 06.02.2014 15:15, schrieb Tom Rymes:
> This isn't documentation-related, but is relevant tot he subject you
> brought up. Perhaps it would be worthwhile to change the user interface
> to add an element that requires a user to "Enable insecure encryption
> methods" before using protocols that are considered weak?
> 
> That way a user could still use those methods if required for
> interoperability, but it would be clear that it is not recommended for
> security reasons.

--===============8183557392565128400==--