From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Tremer To: documentation@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: New wiki painful to use Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 13:01:19 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <04881e1c-e3e3-a313-7b90-ea2ba0694bc3@rymes.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2470413255609743724==" List-Id: --===============2470413255609743724== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I disagree on the colour. Not because of the colour-blindness argument, but r= ather that we are writing technical documentation here. How appealing it look= s is rather less important to me. It is more important to deliver the informa= tion and present it in a way that it is accessible to as many people as possi= ble and there is no room for misinterpretation. Visually I find the big table more appealing as well. On the pictogram thing. What about using unicode characters for this? We could rate the boards with stars? =E2=98=85 to =E2=98=85=E2=98=85=E2=98=85= =E2=98=85=E2=98=85? How about that? -Michael > On 5 Sep 2019, at 22:23, Tom Rymes wrote: >=20 > I'm with John on this one, the modified version is inferior. I get that we = need to be conscious of color-blindness, but the new version doesn't work for= anyone. May I suggest: >=20 > Green Checkmark: Very well supported. > Empty Yellow Circle: Basic Support. > Red "X": Does not work. > Universal Prohibition Symbol: Does not work and no support planned. >=20 > Tom >=20 > On 09/05/2019 4:52 PM, Jon Murphy wrote: >> Honestly? I think it is too 'flat' and lacks color. The original table w= as almost perfect. >> Suggestions: >> Use Harvey balls - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvey_balls >> -or- >> Use Okto symbols - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Okta >> -or- >> Something similar to Consumer Reports rating symbols: >> https://www.consumerreports.org/video/view/inside-labs/5131824875001/our-r= atings--consumer-reports/ >> And it should include color. <=E2=80=94-- One of those things we disagree= on >> EDIT - added mailing list. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Hi, >>>=20 >>> Yes, I think this works. What do you think? >>>=20 >>> -Michael >>>=20 >>>> On 3 Sep 2019, at 23:19, Jon Murphy wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> Michael - Is this what you are looking for? >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> https://wiki.ipfire.org/hardware/arm/playground >>>>=20 >>>> It is split into three different Tables: >>>> =E2=80=A2 Well Supported (was green before) >>>> =E2=80=A2 Basic support (was yellow before) >>>> =E2=80=A2 'Does not work' and 'Does not work and no support planned' (w= as red and black before) >>>>=20 >>>> Here is the old page with colors: >>>> https://wiki.ipfire.org/hardware/arm >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>>> I=E2=80=99ll begin to remove the color/span code. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Thank you. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Maybe we should have a list at the top with supported boards and then t= he second half of the page can be the non-supported boards? >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> Documentation mailing list >> Documentation(a)lists.ipfire.org >> https://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/documentation > _______________________________________________ > Documentation mailing list > Documentation(a)lists.ipfire.org > https://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/documentation --===============2470413255609743724==--