I'm a bit confused about that. Why would 2.0-002 be newer than 2.0-010? There's a 2.0-012 under 'old approach' but those files have an older timestamp. The 2.0-002 is a tarball, but the 2.0-010 is an ipfire package as are the 'dependancies'. I've used Guardian 2 several times in the past by just extracting according to the instructions on stevee's ;--) page, but that doesn't seem to work with the 2.0-002 tarball. I just get a completely blank page in the GUI.
How do we test?

On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer@ipfire.org> wrote:
Hi,

Ok, next.

Am I right assuming that the '2.0-002'-version at
http://people.ipfire.org/~stevee/guardian-2.0/ plus
http://people.ipfire.org/~stevee/guardian-2.0/packages/dependencies/ is
the latest!?

Best,
Matthias

On 16.07.2016 04:03, Mark Coolen wrote:
> I'm willing to test it as well. I take it the instructions from
> http://planet.ipfire.org/post/introducing-guardian-2-0-for-ipfire are still
> good?
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 8:23 PM, R. W. Rodolico <rodo@dailydata.net> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Tell me what I need to do to test Guardian. I've never installed it,
>> but I am doing it now.
>>
>> Rod
>>
>> On 07/15/2016 05:00 AM, Michael Tremer wrote:
>> > Hi guys,
>> >
>> > even if you have a conversation on the phone, please try keeping us
>> > in the loop.
>> >
>> > So the key points of what I know:
>> >
>> > * A release is targeted for core update 104
>> >
>> > * There are a few changes required so that re-blocking a host after
>> > it has been manually unblocked allows this host the configured
>> > number of tries again and not only one.
>> >
>> > * Many more testers are required since feedback is really low at
>> > this point.
>> >
>> > Did I get this right? What is the ETA for a set of patches on the
>> > mailing list?
>> >
>> > What is the plan to engage more testers?
>> >
>> > Best, -Michael
>> >
>> > On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 14:36 +0200, Daniel Weismüller wrote:
>> >> Hi Stevee I know you are very busy and working hard on the this.
>> >> But if you want to release the new Guardian 2 with Core 104 we
>> >> still need to do some work and it must be tested! So please tell
>> >> us something about the new guardian2 and the state of your work.
>> >>
>> >> Maybe we find more testers here on the list.
>> >>
>> >> Meanwhile I've talked with Michael about the state which I know
>> >> of the guardian2 and we both go confirm that the list of blocked
>> >> IPs which runs in the background isn't a good idea. Please let us
>> >> talk by phone about it again.
>> >>
>> >> - Daniel
>>
>> - --
>> Rod Rodolico
>> Daily Data, Inc.
>> POB 140465
>> Dallas TX 75214-0465
>> 214.827.2170
>> http://www.dailydata.net
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iEYEARECAAYFAleJfncACgkQuVY3UpYMlTQ1ywCfdXuAC8ByMYEOKBpkvV0R+BRm
>> hhAAnR9juXlTjDlTiFMPbGOpDAP9LkOG
>> =5XbU
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>
>
>




--
 _  _           _     ___         _         
 )\/,) ___  __  )L,   ))  __  __  )) __ _ _
((`(( ((_( (|  ((\   ((__((_)((_)(( (('((\(