-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Dear List.
Datum: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 07:42:31 +0100
Von: Alexander Marx <alexander.marx@oab.de>
An: development@lists.ipfire.org
Betreff: BUG 10262
I confirmed Bug #10262.
The webinterface is programmed inconsistently. Under the OPENVPN
advanced options, the field "domain" is checked via
&General::validfqdnname which checks, if the domainname has two parts,
seperated by a dot.
under the DHCP options, the "domain" field is written into the CONF File
without any checks.
Which of the developers is responsible for the DHCP code?
AND: What is the GENERAL policy for a domain name?
Should there be just a name (which also needs to be checked) or do we
need to have a dot-sperarated domain name?
I don't know what is the RFC for this, but i think it should be in DNS
compatible form "domain.toplevel".
Any thoughts?
Alex
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@lists.ipfire.org
http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/development