On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 21:11 +0200, Maurice Gesswein wrote:
> How can I permanently display closed bugs in bugzilla?
What do you want to do with them?
>
> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Maurice Gesswein <maurice.gesswein@ip
> fire.org> wrote:
> > I meant Ubuntu 500 if this is the medium weight. Sorry for
> > confusion.
> >
> > Am 02.05.2017 7:25 vorm. schrieb "Sven" <sven.hoehn@posteo.de>:
> > For questions and feedback on the bug, where do I fill that, per
> > eMail or on bugzilla?
> >
> > I see a couple of issues at the buttons I would like to fix. I'll
> > simply list them down.
> >
> > * Touch targets (48px) at 36px buttons are missing. Thats important
> > for e.g. Smartphone to provide a comfortable touch zone for an
> > element/button. Let me know if you want to learn more about that.
> > * The border on filled buttons falsified the left/right paddings.
> > Please remove the border if the button don't need it
> > * Please recheck the left/right paddings of ALL buttons and compare
> > carefully with the Pattern Lib sheet at Zeplin. Paddings are
> > different if an icon is included.
> >
> > Maybe it is easier to rewrite the buttons completely and don’t use
> > the bootstrap buttons at all. But I will check.
> >
> > * It looks like that "Ubuntu-Medium (600)" is not imported:
> > @import url("
> > https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Ubuntu:300,400,700
> > ");
> > Can you replace 700 with 600 for now please? I guess I'll not use
> > bold (700) in the designs.
> >
> > There is no Ubuntu font from Google with a width of 600. Google
> > offers only 300 (light), 400 (regular), 500 (medium) and 700
> > (bold).
> >
> > > On 1. May 2017, at 23:26, Maurice Gesswein <maurice.gesswein@ipfi
> > > re.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi. I just created my 1st bug ticket in bugzilla. Is there no
> > > edit link for the description?!
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Sven <sven.hoehn@posteo.de>
> > > wrote:
> > > > no problem.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On 26. Apr 2017, at 17:23, Maurice Gesswein <maurice.gesswein
> > > > > @ipfire.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Not yet, sorry. I'm pretty busy at the moment :(
> > > > >
> > > > > Am 26.04.2017 1:47 nachm. schrieb "Sven" <sven.hoehn@posteo.d
> > > > > e>:
> > > > > > Hello.
> > > > > > Has someone already put a bug into the Redesign category?
> > > > > > Do I get a notification if someone put something in there?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Greetings,
> > > > > > Sven
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 24. Apr 2017, at 12:11, Michael Tremer <michael.tremer
> > > > > > @ipfire.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 12:02 +0200, Maurice Gesswein
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> Hi,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I'm going to write some bug reports related to
> > > > > > dev.ipfire.org. As far as I see
> > > > > > >> there is no component in Bugzilla for dev.ipfire.org.
> > > > > > There is only a general
> > > > > > >> "Web Site" component. Should I use that component for my
> > > > > > reports and refer
> > > > > > >> to dev.ipfire.org?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yes, please use that one.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> I also remember and see the umbrella bug "Big Website
> > > > > > Relaunch". I assume that
> > > > > > >> bugs related to dev.ipfire.org should be somehow linked
> > > > > > to that umbrella bug.
> > > > > > >> How does it work? I see nothing helpful on the "new bug"
> > > > > > form. Is there a
> > > > > > >> hidden mechanism which links a new bug reports to that
> > > > > > umbrella bug whenever I
> > > > > > >> refer to that by writing "#11314" (umbrella bug ID) in
> > > > > > the summary?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You can just add the bug ID in the "blocks" field. That
> > > > > > will automatically
> > > > > > > connect the two bug reports.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sorry if I have not been clear about this :) Ask me if
> > > > > > there is anything else I
> > > > > > > forgot to mention.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Michael
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Best,
> > > > > > >> Maurice
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>