Re: [IPFire Artwork] Website: Feature page

Re: [IPFire Artwork] Website: Feature page

[Michael Tremer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2123 bytes --]

On Sat, 2016-03-12 at 21:09 +0100, Maurice Gesswein wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Michael Tremer <michael.tremer(a)ipfir
> e.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 23:35 +0100, Maurice Gesswein wrote:
> > > Hey folks,
> > >
> > > I'm very sorry for my late absence. But now I'm able to show you
> > a
> > > suggestion for the feature/about page :)
> > 
> > Don't worry. I am also still catching up with so many things and
> > didn't
> > really find the time yet to implement the captive portal stuff. I
> > have
> > started though. More on that in an other email.
> > 
> > > I'm aware of all the missing content. That screenshot should give
> > you
> > > a first impression.
> > >
> > > The TOC (table of content) on the left side should be sticky and
> > > doesn't disappear while you scroll down.
> > > Example: http://getbootstrap.com/getting-started/#download
> > 
> > Yeah the content is quite outdated. I am not too happy with this at
> > the
> > moment.
> > 
> > Do you think it is a better idea to have one single long page or
> > multiple sub-pages?
> I prefer a single long page. Multiple pages would it make a lot more
> complex for the users. Take a look at my provides example page.
> That's a very good solution for that case.

A single long page it is then :)

>  
> > 
> > I like the one long page approach better. We should have shorter
> > texts
> > there to keep attention of the reader. If we have sub-pages this
> > won't
> > look like much.
> > 
> > > Since there are a lot of top level points and the list becomes
> > quite
> > > long you may consider to reorganize it. Personally I like it the
> > way
> > > Bootstrap does it by using more sub-level points and only show
> > them
> > > if the parent point is selected. That would save us a bit of
> > space.
> > > If the browser window is not high enough you don't see the last
> > > couple of points.
> > >
> > > As always - designs for the mobile views will follow.
> > >
> > > Let me know your thoughts or concerns.
> > 
> > Great as always :)
> > 
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Maurice
> > 
> > Best,
> > -Michael
> > 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: [IPFire Artwork] Website: Feature page

[Michael Tremer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1510 bytes --]

Hi,

On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 23:35 +0100, Maurice Gesswein wrote:
> Hey folks,
> 
> I'm very sorry for my late absence. But now I'm able to show you a
> suggestion for the feature/about page :)

Don't worry. I am also still catching up with so many things and didn't
really find the time yet to implement the captive portal stuff. I have
started though. More on that in an other email.

> I'm aware of all the missing content. That screenshot should give you
> a first impression.
> 
> The TOC (table of content) on the left side should be sticky and
> doesn't disappear while you scroll down.
> Example: http://getbootstrap.com/getting-started/#download

Yeah the content is quite outdated. I am not too happy with this at the
moment.

Do you think it is a better idea to have one single long page or
multiple sub-pages?

I like the one long page approach better. We should have shorter texts
there to keep attention of the reader. If we have sub-pages this won't
look like much.

> Since there are a lot of top level points and the list becomes quite
> long you may consider to reorganize it. Personally I like it the way
> Bootstrap does it by using more sub-level points and only show them
> if the parent point is selected. That would save us a bit of space.
> If the browser window is not high enough you don't see the last
> couple of points.
> 
> As always - designs for the mobile views will follow.
> 
> Let me know your thoughts or concerns.

Great as always :)

> 
> Best,
> Maurice

Best,
-Michael