That would be fine for me. - Daniel Am 03.02.2016 um 14:53 schrieb Michael Tremer: > Hi, > > sorry for not getting back earlier... > > On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 23:23 +0100, Maurice Gesswein wrote: >> Hi, >> >> attached you find design/layout suggestions for all mentioned captive >> portal websites. > It looks great! > >> Some notes: >> The layout is always the same. You are able to build one template >> which can used for every site. > That is handy. > >> The layout is very responsive friendly (smartphone, tablet) as you >> can see at the access-voucher_360.jpg (standard Android phone size) >> I strongly recommend to don't use scrollable content within a >> scrollable page (see first 2 screenshots from Alex). You become crazy >> if you want to navigate though that on a touch device. > LOL > >> A specific header image can be used for every case. > Okay, we need to build a way to upload that and possibly some > specifications that we can give to people to design theirs in the right > way. > >> There are tiny and simple code snippets which scale the header image >> for every size correctly. I'll check this out to provide you with >> more detailed information. >> Just checked getbootstrap.com. Seems to be that such a functionality >> is already included. > Cool. > >> A footer where you are able to promote IPFire ;) > Always good. > >> Layout based on Bootstap 3 >> I used the color-theme for the upcoming new IPFire website and WebUI. >> @Michael the bright red is not the new primary IPFire red ;) It's the >> error-red. I'll show more about that soon. >> I suggested new text for the errors. Maybe you like it :) >> >> Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. > There is nothing from me I would like to see changed. So I suppose that > we can regard this as the final draft. > > Would you be up for arranging a telephone conference with Daniel & > Alex, because I think that I have many questions regarding how we get > from the draft to code :) How about Monday evening? > > Best, > -Michael > >> Best, >> Maurice >> >> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Daniel Weismüller > @ipfire.org> wrote: >>> No. >>> >>> The last screenshot shows the customization part from "good old" >>> configurationsite of the url-filter. >>> For better understanding i've made a (3) screenshot(s) of the >>> whole page. >>> >>> - Daniel >>> >>> >>> Am 01.02.2016 um 14:32 schrieb Maurice Gesswein: >>>> Is that the place where the hoster can include his own T&Cs, >>>> upload a company logo, add the company name, etc? >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Daniel Weismüller >>> ller(a)ipfire.org> wrote: >>>>> me again :) >>>>> >>>>> Another screenshot now from the webif where you may customize >>>>> blockpage from the url-filter. >>>>> >>>>> - Daniel >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Am 01.02.2016 um 14:24 schrieb Maurice Gesswein: >>>>>> Perfect. Thanks Daniel. >>>>>> Am 01.02.2016 2:22 nachm. schrieb "Daniel Weismüller" >>>>> .weismueller(a)ipfire.org>: >>>>>>> Here are the screenshots as requested. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Daniel >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 31.01.2016 um 08:53 schrieb Maurice Gesswein: >>>>>>>> Good morning, >>>>>>>> I use lorem ipsum than. Thanks. >>>>>>>> Am 31.01.2016 4:31 vorm. schrieb "Michael Tremer" >>>>>>> l.tremer(a)ipfire.org>: >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 22:06 +0100, Maurice Gesswein >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Can someone send me the terms & condition text from >>>>>>>>> the screenshots >>>>>>>>>> as real text? >>>>>>>>> There is a text area where the user will type in the >>>>>>>>> T&Cs. So there is >>>>>>>>> no predefined text and it might change. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Do you still want some sample or can you just use lorem >>>>>>>>> ipsum? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -Michael >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 4:01 AM, Michael Tremer >>>>>>>> ael.tremer(a)ipfir >>>>>>>>>> e.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 20:37 +0100, Alexander Marx >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, in general I got it. Thanks for the screens >>>>>>>>> Alex. >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a few questions and suggestions. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> To be prepared for further upcoming pages like >>>>>>>>> these, are you >>>>>>>>>>> able >>>>>>>>>>>>> to hand over a list of them (perhaps with >>>>>>>>> screenshots)? Not >>>>>>>>>>> really >>>>>>>>>>>>> needed, but very helpful to deliver a >>>>>>>>> consistent flexible >>>>>>>>>>> design. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Don't worry about them too much. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> As far as i know there are no other "external" >>>>>>>>> pages. The >>>>>>>>>>>> Webinterface of IPFire has an own design and >>>>>>>>> several themes, i >>>>>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>>>> you already saw them. >>>>>>>>>>> However, there are a few. I included both of them >>>>>>>>> in the first >>>>>>>>>>> email. >>>>>>>>>>> On top of that there are the squid error pages. I >>>>>>>>> am not too sure >>>>>>>>>>> if we >>>>>>>>>>> can modify those quite nicely. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I will figure that out and get back to you. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Should the hoster be able to include his own >>>>>>>>> logo/brand? That >>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>> give the users a lot more trust in that things. >>>>>>>>> If an image >>>>>>>>>>> upload >>>>>>>>>>>>> is not in the current scope, I suggest a >>>>>>>>> prominent headline >>>>>>>>>>> where >>>>>>>>>>>>> the hoster is able to include the company name. >>>>>>>>> Do you agree? >>>>>>>>>>>> Actually the hoster is able to change the Title >>>>>>>>> (The top-title in >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> screenies like "Login" or on the other page "My >>>>>>>>> private HotSpot") >>>>>>>>>>>> maybe we can add a Logo but we have to decide >>>>>>>>> which dimensions >>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>> allowed. This is difficult as many companies have >>>>>>>>> different >>>>>>>>>>>> dimensions of Logos. Some are 4:3, others are >>>>>>>>> like 27:9 and so >>>>>>>>>>> on. >>>>>>>>>>>> What do other people think? >>>>>>>>>>> I think we don't need that. We usually have the >>>>>>>>> opportunity to >>>>>>>>>>> upload >>>>>>>>>>> an entire HTML template, so that if someone wants >>>>>>>>> to replace the >>>>>>>>>>> page, >>>>>>>>>>> they can do that. But just a logo is a bit too >>>>>>>>> easy. Who ever wants >>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>> brand this as their own should do that with the >>>>>>>>> rest, too. >>>>>>>>>>> And of course we should not forget about doing some >>>>>>>>> advertisement >>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>> our own product :) However, I get many emails from >>>>>>>>> annoyed students >>>>>>>>>>> that can't access dirty websites in their school. >>>>>>>>> LOL >>>>>>>>>>>>> Since it's part of IPFire, should those pages >>>>>>>>> be designed like >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> new upcoming style of IPFire? Means same color >>>>>>>>> theme, button >>>>>>>>>>> style, >>>>>>>>>>>>> IPFire logo, caption like "powered by IPFire", >>>>>>>>> etc? Or should >>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>> totally generic so that the users has no clue >>>>>>>>> what system shows >>>>>>>>>>>>> those dialogs? >>>>>>>>>>> I would like a "powered by IPFire" at least and >>>>>>>>> even advise people >>>>>>>>>>> who >>>>>>>>>>> replace the theme by their own to keep that in. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> This does not need to be like the new stuff but I >>>>>>>>> think it should >>>>>>>>>>> feel >>>>>>>>>>> a bit like IPFire but also be neutral. We do not >>>>>>>>> need to hide that >>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>> is an IPFire system though. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> No. I think if we have something like a >>>>>>>>> "background-color" >>>>>>>>>>> instead of >>>>>>>>>>>> a picture, we should the hoster let configure it, >>>>>>>>> so the people >>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>> able to adpat the colors to their own corporate >>>>>>>>> identity. So if >>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>> woul like to work with gradients or similar, i >>>>>>>>> would recommend to >>>>>>>>>>>> make it configurable. >>>>>>>>>>> Nah, not too many options. We wanted to keep this >>>>>>>>> simple. >>>>>>>>>>>> Michael, what do you think? >>>>>>>>>>> See above :) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -Michael >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, Maurice >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Alexander Marx >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> @oab >>>>>>>>>>>>> .de> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here are the actual ugly screenshots from the >>>>>>>>> loginpage. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> one version with voucher access and the other >>>>>>>>> one with >>>>>>>>>>> license >>>>>>>>>>>>>> agreement. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 29.01.2016 um 02:59 schrieb Michael >>>>>>>>> Tremer: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Maurice, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that you are busy with other things, >>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>> nevertheless I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like to send you this request. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex is currently working on a so called >>>>>>>>> captive portal. >>>>>>>>>>> That >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are these >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things that pop up on your phone or laptop >>>>>>>>> when you connect >>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wireless network in a hotel or cafe. That >>>>>>>>> web page that is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shown is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what we need to design now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We also have a few other pages that are >>>>>>>>> shown to the users >>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> network when for example a web page is >>>>>>>>> blocked. That page >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> however is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really ugly and probably needs a remake as >>>>>>>>> well. I want to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focus on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> captive portal for now, but I guess you >>>>>>>>> would like to know >>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are more. [1] and [2]. Really bad right? >>>>>>>>> They scare users. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex will send you a screenshot of the >>>>>>>>> development version >>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is just a quick page to show the >>>>>>>>> concept and what we >>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> roughly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are two options for now. The first >>>>>>>>> one is where the >>>>>>>>>>> user >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agree to a license and click a "I accept" >>>>>>>>> button. The >>>>>>>>>>> second >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where the user will have to type in a >>>>>>>>> voucher code and >>>>>>>>>>> click a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> button >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to log in. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you like to work on this? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If so, a quick mock-up would be okay for >>>>>>>>> now, because we >>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> put this entire project on the wishlist to >>>>>>>>> raise some >>>>>>>>>>> crowd- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> funding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> money. Giving the user that mock-up would >>>>>>>>> certainly help so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get a good impression what they are >>>>>>>>> supporting here. The >>>>>>>>>>> actual >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation will happen a bit later when >>>>>>>>> enough funds >>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> raised. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex, would you please send some >>>>>>>>> screenshots of the two >>>>>>>>>>> pages >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so far? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Michael >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> P.S. @Maurice, I know that I am throwing a >>>>>>>>> bit of random >>>>>>>>>>> stuff >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just let me know when I don't make sense >>>>>>>>> any more :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9sw4wUeUsgQ/V >>>>>>>>> fU-c33FMDI/AAAAA >>>>>>>>>>> AAAD >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> zM/bBnJN4oCffo/s640/31.png >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] http://wiki.ipfire.org/_media/en/addons >>>>>>>>> /clamav/squidcla >>>>>>>>>>> mav- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> detection.png >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>