all the changes that I made today are not yet visible on the dev page. So please wait before you fill new bugs :-) > On 3. May 2017, at 21:12, Michael Tremer wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 21:11 +0200, Maurice Gesswein wrote: >> How can I permanently display closed bugs in bugzilla? > > What do you want to do with them? > >> >> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Maurice Gesswein > fire.org> wrote: >>> I meant Ubuntu 500 if this is the medium weight. Sorry for >>> confusion. >>> >>> Am 02.05.2017 7:25 vorm. schrieb "Sven" : >>> For questions and feedback on the bug, where do I fill that, per >>> eMail or on bugzilla? >>> >>> I see a couple of issues at the buttons I would like to fix. I'll >>> simply list them down. >>> >>> * Touch targets (48px) at 36px buttons are missing. Thats important >>> for e.g. Smartphone to provide a comfortable touch zone for an >>> element/button. Let me know if you want to learn more about that. >>> * The border on filled buttons falsified the left/right paddings. >>> Please remove the border if the button don't need it >>> * Please recheck the left/right paddings of ALL buttons and compare >>> carefully with the Pattern Lib sheet at Zeplin. Paddings are >>> different if an icon is included. >>> >>> Maybe it is easier to rewrite the buttons completely and don’t use >>> the bootstrap buttons at all. But I will check. >>> >>> * It looks like that "Ubuntu-Medium (600)" is not imported: >>> @import url(" >>> https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Ubuntu:300,400,700 >>> "); >>> Can you replace 700 with 600 for now please? I guess I'll not use >>> bold (700) in the designs. >>> >>> There is no Ubuntu font from Google with a width of 600. Google >>> offers only 300 (light), 400 (regular), 500 (medium) and 700 >>> (bold). >>> >>>> On 1. May 2017, at 23:26, Maurice Gesswein >>> re.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi. I just created my 1st bug ticket in bugzilla. Is there no >>>> edit link for the description?! >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Sven >>>> wrote: >>>>> no problem. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 26. Apr 2017, at 17:23, Maurice Gesswein >>>>> @ipfire.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Not yet, sorry. I'm pretty busy at the moment :( >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 26.04.2017 1:47 nachm. schrieb "Sven" >>>>> e>: >>>>>>> Hello. >>>>>>> Has someone already put a bug into the Redesign category? >>>>>>> Do I get a notification if someone put something in there? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Greetings, >>>>>>> Sven >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 24. Apr 2017, at 12:11, Michael Tremer >>>>>> @ipfire.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 12:02 +0200, Maurice Gesswein >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm going to write some bug reports related to >>>>>>> dev.ipfire.org. As far as I see >>>>>>>>> there is no component in Bugzilla for dev.ipfire.org. >>>>>>> There is only a general >>>>>>>>> "Web Site" component. Should I use that component for my >>>>>>> reports and refer >>>>>>>>> to dev.ipfire.org? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, please use that one. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I also remember and see the umbrella bug "Big Website >>>>>>> Relaunch". I assume that >>>>>>>>> bugs related to dev.ipfire.org should be somehow linked >>>>>>> to that umbrella bug. >>>>>>>>> How does it work? I see nothing helpful on the "new bug" >>>>>>> form. Is there a >>>>>>>>> hidden mechanism which links a new bug reports to that >>>>>>> umbrella bug whenever I >>>>>>>>> refer to that by writing "#11314" (umbrella bug ID) in >>>>>>> the summary? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can just add the bug ID in the "blocks" field. That >>>>>>> will automatically >>>>>>>> connect the two bug reports. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sorry if I have not been clear about this :) Ask me if >>>>>>> there is anything else I >>>>>>>> forgot to mention. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Michael >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> Maurice >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >>