Hi, I am absolutely fine with keeping descr. I just wasn’t sure if you intended to change the name or not. I will merge them. Best, -Michael > On 9 Jun 2020, at 13:07, Peter Müller wrote: > > Hello Michael, > > this is somewhat intended as I would rather keep the original AS name and "describe" > more precisely what we are dealing with. On the other hand, that sounds more like > "remarks"... > > Not sure what to do with it then - your opinion? > > Thanks, and best regards, > Peter Müller > > >> Hi, >> >>> On 9 Jun 2020, at 13:00, Peter Müller wrote: >>> >>> Partially fixes: #12421 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Peter Müller >>> --- >>> overrides/override-other.txt | 5 +++++ >>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/overrides/override-other.txt b/overrides/override-other.txt >>> index 583bf43..2494d0c 100644 >>> --- a/overrides/override-other.txt >>> +++ b/overrides/override-other.txt >>> @@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ descr: Network Dedicated SAS >>> remarks: bulletproof ISP, claims to be located in CH, but traces to NL >>> country: NL >>> >>> +aut-num: AS202425 >>> +descr: IP Volume Inc. >> >> Are you sure you want the field above to be called descr? That would not change the name of the AS in the database. >> >> Just checking... >> >>> +remarks: bulletproof ISP (aka: AS29073 / Ecatel Ltd. / Quasi Networks Ltd.) located in NL >>> +country: NL >>> + >>> aut-num: AS207616 >>> descr: Altrosky Technology Ltd. >>> remarks: fake offshore location (SC), traces back to CZ >>> -- >>> 2.26.2 >>