From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nusenu To: location@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: ASNs without AS name information (LACNIC and JPNIC) Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 23:16:30 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <84129c12-8656-d673-7a98-01f4a93b5a8e@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8870898457945725380==" List-Id: --===============8870898457945725380== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >> Both AS lack an "aut-num" object in JPNIC, which is why there is no parsea= ble information >> for them at hand in there. Not sure where RIPEstat gets their description = from... >> >> Anyways, ARIN, LACNIC and a better approach to missing data is on my list = for next week. >> I'll see what we can to then. >=20 >=20 > AS names (the holder's name) shown on RIPEstat come from the CIDR report > https://www.cidr-report.org/as2.0/ > according to RIPE NCC's reply. >=20 > Maybe this is a one for all solution. Since you apparently don't like this data source and I always thought RIPEstat has pretty good data quality: Would you mind sharing your opinion on this? kind regards, nusenu --=20 https://nusenu.github.io --===============8870898457945725380==--