From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter =?utf-8?q?M=C3=BCller?= To: location@lists.ipfire.org Subject: Re: ASNs without AS name information (LACNIC and JPNIC) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 21:10:01 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <666CB5D5-A340-4DEB-AB59-84E9B3D2F252@ipfire.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5207697039360167347==" List-Id: --===============5207697039360167347== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello nusenu, hello Michael, > Since you apparently don't like this data source > and I always thought RIPEstat has pretty good data quality: > Would you mind sharing your opinion on this?=20 sorry for not replying on this sooner. Actually, I do not like or dislike RIP= Estat; I just did not have sufficient time to made myself an educated opinion on this. At the moment, things are quite packed on my end, but that will hopefully ove= r at the beginning of February. So, this is not forgotten or silently discarded, but just a very= tardy reply due to my "load average"... > @Peter: Do you want to look into extracting information from this? Yes. Without looking at the amount of queries we'd probably need to do: Do you thi= nk this makes sense while running the location-importer, or should this become a dedicated script= , which we can run in the background all the time, so it won't slow down the daily generation of= the actual database. In case of the latter, we could actually do some scraping on the ARIN AS name= s, too. Since we keep track of their source, this should not be too hard, and if we get some more h= uman-readable names for some of them, it might be worth the effort. Thanks, and best regards, Peter M=C3=BCller --===============5207697039360167347==--